The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.
作者信息
Summers Teresa M
机构信息
Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA.
出版信息
Georgetown Law J. 2003 Jan;91(2):475-509.
PMID:15046071
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.21世纪的实用性范围：基因相关专利的新指南
Georgetown Law J. 2003 Jan;91(2):475-509.
2
A modest proposal: toward improved access to biotechnology research tools by implementing a broad experimental use exception.一项适度的提议：通过实施广泛的实验性使用例外来改善对生物技术研究工具的获取。
Cornell Law Rev. 2004 May;89(4):993-1043.
3
Public access versus proprietary rights in genomic information: what is the proper role of intellectual property rights?基因组信息中的公共获取与所有权：知识产权的恰当作用是什么？
J Health Care Law Policy. 2003;6(2):222-40.
4
Genetic patents: gatekeeper to the promised cures.基因专利：通往预期疗法的守门人。
Thomas Jefferson Law Rev. 2002 Fall;25(1):271-99.
5
Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.科学与法律。解决专利问题。
Science. 2003 Feb 14;299(5609):1021. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5609.1021.
6
Intellectual property rights in genes and gene fragments: a registration solution for expressed sequence tags.基因和基因片段中的知识产权：表达序列标签的一种注册解决方案。
Iowa Law Rev. 2000 Mar;85(3):735-848.
7
Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science.规范科学研究：知识产权与科学规范
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1999 Fall;94(1):77-152.
8
9
Intellectual property and biotechnology: the U.S. internal experience--Part II.知识产权与生物技术：美国国内经验——第二部分
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Jun;16(2):105-28. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0007.
10
Much ado about gene patents: the role of foreseeability.基因专利引发的诸多争议：可预测性的作用。
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2004;34(2):711-45.
Zotero 插件