• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

市场力量与高效的医疗保健系统。

Market forces and efficient health care systems.

作者信息

Enthoven Alain C

机构信息

Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):25-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.25.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.25
PMID:15046128
Abstract

The "market forces" to which economists ascribe the ability to motivate improvement in quality and efficiency are largely nonexistent in U.S. health care. One thus might ask, "Could market forces be made strong enough to deliver efficient health care systems?" There is some evidence to suggest that the answer is "Yes." This paper offers a short list of some changes that would be needed to create such a health care economy. Continued increases in costs and in the numbers of uninsured people will likely make a universal coverage model based on Medicare a politically popular choice, but such a model would not deliver efficient health care systems because it lacks sufficient incentives for consumers to choose less costly options.

摘要

经济学家认为能够推动质量和效率提升的“市场力量”在美国医疗保健领域基本不存在。因此有人可能会问:“能否让市场力量强大到足以提供高效的医疗保健体系?”有证据表明答案是“可以”。本文简要列出了建立这样一种医疗保健经济所需的一些变革。成本的持续上升以及未参保人数的增加可能会使基于医疗保险的全民覆盖模式成为政治上受欢迎的选择,但这种模式无法提供高效的医疗保健体系,因为它缺乏足够的激励措施促使消费者选择成本较低的方案。

相似文献

1
Market forces and efficient health care systems.市场力量与高效的医疗保健系统。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):25-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.25.
2
Are market forces strong enough to deliver efficient health care systems? Confidence is waning.市场力量是否强大到足以提供高效的医疗保健系统?信心正在减弱。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):8-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.8.
3
Why is there a quality chasm?为什么会存在质量鸿沟?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Aug;21(4):13-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.13.
4
Health care consolidation and the changing health care marketplace. A review of the literature and issues.医疗保健合并与不断变化的医疗保健市场。文献综述与问题探讨。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1999 Oct(214):1-15.
5
Organizational and management strategies in response to U.S. market trends.
J Health Organ Manag. 2004;18(4-5):370-9. doi: 10.1108/14777260410560848.
6
The economics of managing healthcare delivery systems by service lines.按服务线管理医疗服务提供系统的经济学
Health Syst Lead. 1997 Jul;4(7):4-12.
7
Transforming U.S. health care: the arduous road to value.变革美国医疗保健:通往价值的艰难之路。
Top Health Inf Manage. 2000 Feb;20(3):1-10.
8
Health insurance coverage, income distribution and healthcare quality in local healthcare markets.本地医疗市场中的医疗保险覆盖范围、收入分配和医疗质量。
Health Econ. 2013 Aug;22(8):987-1002. doi: 10.1002/hec.2874. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
9
Accountable care organizations and antitrust: restructuring the health care market.accountable care organizations与反垄断:重塑医疗保健市场
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1493-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.451.
10
Private health care in Nigeria: walking the tightrope.尼日利亚的私立医疗保健:如履薄冰。
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Jun;14(2):174-81. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.2.174.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicalization: A historical perspective.医学化:历史视角
J Gen Fam Med. 2017 Mar 24;18(2):48-51. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.22. eCollection 2017 Apr.
2
Market forces in urological practice.泌尿外科实践中的市场力量。
Indian J Urol. 2017 Oct-Dec;33(4):264-266. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_411_16.
3
The economics of cancer care: longitudinal changes in provider efficiency.癌症护理经济学:医疗服务提供者效率的纵向变化
Health Care Manag Sci. 2009 Jun;12(2):192-200. doi: 10.1007/s10729-008-9079-2.
4
Does competition improve health care quality?竞争能提高医疗保健质量吗?
Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec;43(6):1931-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00899.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
5
Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services.心脏需求证明法规以及血运重建服务的可及性与使用情况。
Am Heart J. 2007 Oct;154(4):767-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.031.