• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与传统氧化铝和二氧化钛颗粒相比,在纳米相存在的情况下,活成骨细胞密度增加。

Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles.

作者信息

Gutwein Luke G, Webster Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 1296 Potter Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1296, USA.

出版信息

Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(18):4175-83. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.090.

DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.090
PMID:15046907
Abstract

In the present in vitro study, osteoblast (bone-forming cells) viability and cell density were investigated when cultured in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional (i.e. micron) alumina and titania particles at various concentrations (from 10,000 to 100 microg/ml of cell culture media) for up to 6h. Results confirmed previous studies of the detrimental influences of all ceramic particulates on osteoblast viability and cell densities. For the first time, however, results provided evidence of increased apoptotic cell death when cultured in the presence of conventional compared to nanophase alumina and titania particles. Moreover, since material characterization studies revealed that the only difference between respective ceramic particles was nanometer- and conventional-dimensions (specifically, phase and chemical properties were similar between respective nanophase and conventional alumina as well as titania particles), these results indicated that osteoblast viability and densities were influenced solely by particle size. Such nanometer particulate wear debris may result from friction between articulating components of orthopedic implants composed of novel nanophase ceramic materials. Results of a less detrimental effect of nanometer--as compared to conventional-dimensioned particles on the functions of osteoblasts provide additional evidence that nanophase ceramics may become the next generation of bone prosthetic materials with increased efficacy and, thus, deserve further testing.

摘要

在当前的体外研究中,将成骨细胞(骨形成细胞)与常规(即微米级)氧化铝和二氧化钛颗粒在不同浓度(细胞培养基中为10,000至100微克/毫升)下培养长达6小时,研究纳米相颗粒存在时的成骨细胞活力和细胞密度。结果证实了先前关于所有陶瓷颗粒对成骨细胞活力和细胞密度有有害影响的研究。然而,首次有结果表明,与纳米相氧化铝和二氧化钛颗粒相比,在常规颗粒存在下培养时,凋亡细胞死亡增加。此外,由于材料表征研究表明,各陶瓷颗粒之间的唯一差异在于纳米级和常规尺寸(具体而言,各纳米相和常规氧化铝以及二氧化钛颗粒之间的相和化学性质相似),这些结果表明成骨细胞活力和密度仅受颗粒大小影响。这种纳米级颗粒磨损碎屑可能源于由新型纳米相陶瓷材料制成的骨科植入物关节部件之间摩擦。与常规尺寸颗粒相比,纳米级颗粒对成骨细胞功能的有害影响较小,这一结果提供了额外证据,表明纳米相陶瓷可能成为下一代具有更高功效的骨修复材料,因此值得进一步测试。

相似文献

1
Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles.与传统氧化铝和二氧化钛颗粒相比,在纳米相存在的情况下,活成骨细胞密度增加。
Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(18):4175-83. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.090.
2
Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo.成骨细胞在纳米相金属(钛、Ti6Al4V和钴铬钼合金)上的黏附增加。
Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(19):4731-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.002.
3
Increased osteoblast functions on theta + delta nanofiber alumina.在θ+δ纳米纤维氧化铝上成骨细胞功能增强。
Biomaterials. 2005 Mar;26(9):953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.040.
4
Increased osteoblast function on PLGA composites containing nanophase titania.含纳米相二氧化钛的聚乳酸-羟基乙酸共聚物复合材料上成骨细胞功能增强。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005 Sep 15;74(4):677-86. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30358.
5
Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanograined Ti modified with KRSR.在经KRSR修饰的纳米晶钛上成骨细胞黏附增加。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Mar 1;80(3):602-11. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30954.
6
Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography.纳米相氧化铝材料上的成骨细胞功能:化学、相和形貌的影响。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Dec 15;67(4):1284-93. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.20011.
7
Evaluation of cytocompatibility and bending modulus of nanoceramic/polymer composites.纳米陶瓷/聚合物复合材料的细胞相容性和弯曲模量评估。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005 Jan 1;72(1):98-106. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30204.
8
Better osteoblast adhesion on nanoparticulate selenium- A promising orthopedic implant material.纳米颗粒硒上更好的成骨细胞黏附——一种有前景的骨科植入材料。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005 Nov 1;75(2):356-64. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30423.
9
Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells.工程化二氧化钛纳米管表面对骨细胞的影响。
Biomaterials. 2007 Jul;28(21):3188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.020. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
10
Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics.成骨细胞在纳米相陶瓷上的黏附
Biomaterials. 1999 Jul;20(13):1221-7. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00020-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced Strategies for Enhancing the Biocompatibility and Antibacterial Properties of Implantable Structures.增强可植入结构生物相容性和抗菌性能的先进策略
Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;18(4):822. doi: 10.3390/ma18040822.
2
Nanoengineering and Surface Modifications of Dental Implants.牙种植体的纳米工程与表面改性
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51526. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51526. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
The Effects of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on Osteoblasts Mineralization: A Comparison between 2D and 3D Cell Culture Models.
二氧化钛纳米颗粒对成骨细胞矿化的影响:二维和三维细胞培养模型的比较
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;13(3):425. doi: 10.3390/nano13030425.
4
Microbial Decontamination and Antibacterial Activity of Nanostructured Titanium Dental Implants: A Narrative Review.纳米结构钛牙科植入物的微生物去污与抗菌活性:一项叙述性综述
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Sep 8;11(9):2336. doi: 10.3390/nano11092336.
5
Influence of Ceramic Debris on Osteoblast Behaviors: An In Vivo Study.陶瓷碎屑对成骨细胞行为的影响:一项体内研究。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):770-776. doi: 10.1111/os.12496. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
6
The two faces of titanium dioxide nanoparticles bio-camouflage in 3D bone spheroids.二氧化钛纳米颗粒在 3D 骨球体中的生物伪装的两面性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 27;9(1):9309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45797-6.
7
The Biologic Response to Bearing Materials.对轴承材料的生物反应。
Orthop Knowl Online. 2016 Jun;14(6).
8
Biological Activation of Inert Ceramics: Recent Advances Using Tailored Self-Assembled Monolayers on Implant Ceramic Surfaces.惰性陶瓷的生物活化:利用植入陶瓷表面定制自组装单分子层的最新进展
Materials (Basel). 2014 Jun 12;7(6):4473-4492. doi: 10.3390/ma7064473.
9
Osteogenic activity of titanium surfaces with hierarchical micro-/nano-structures obtained by hydrofluoric acid treatment.通过氢氟酸处理获得的具有分级微/纳米结构的钛表面的成骨活性。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Feb 16;12:1317-1328. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S123930. eCollection 2017.
10
The biological response to orthopedic implants for joint replacement. II: Polyethylene, ceramics, PMMA, and the foreign body reaction.关节置换术中骨科植入物的生物学反应。II:聚乙烯、陶瓷、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯及异物反应。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017 Aug;105(6):1685-1691. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33676. Epub 2016 Apr 15.