Kuter David J
Hematology/Oncology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Oncologist. 2004;9(2):207-16. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-2-207.
Central venous catheters (CVCs), such as the tunneled catheters and the totally implanted ports, play a major role in general medicine and oncology. Aside from the complications (pneumothorax, hemorrhage) associated with their initial insertion, all of these CVCs are associated with the long-term risks of infection and thrombosis. Despite routine flushing with heparin or saline, 41% of CVCs result in thrombosis of the blood vessel, and this markedly increases the risk of infection. Only one-third of these clots are symptomatic. Within days of insertion, almost all CVCs are coated with a fibrin sheath, and within 30 days, most CVC-related thrombi arise. Aside from reducing the function of the catheter, these CVC-related thrombi can cause postphlebitic syndrome in 15%-30% of cases and pulmonary embolism in 11% (only half of which are symptomatic). Risk factors for CVC thrombosis include the type of malignancy, type of chemotherapy, type of CVC, and locations of insertion site and catheter tip, but not inherited thrombophilic risk factors. Efforts to reduce CVC thrombosis with systemic prophylactic anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin have failed. Low-dose warfarin prophylaxis remains controversial; all studies are flawed, with older studies, but not newer ones, showing benefit. Currently, less than 10% of patients with CVCs receive any systemic prophylaxis. Although its general use cannot be recommended, low-dose warfarin may be a low-risk treatment in patients with good nutrition and adequate hepatic function. Clearly, additional studies are required to substantiate the prophylactic use of low-dose warfarin. Newer anticoagulant treatments, such as pentasaccharide and direct thrombin inhibitors, need to be explored to address this major medical problem.
中心静脉导管(CVC),如隧道式导管和完全植入式端口,在普通医学和肿瘤学中发挥着重要作用。除了与初始插入相关的并发症(气胸、出血)外,所有这些CVC都存在感染和血栓形成的长期风险。尽管常规用肝素或生理盐水冲洗,但41%的CVC会导致血管血栓形成,这显著增加了感染风险。这些血栓中只有三分之一有症状。插入后数天内,几乎所有CVC都会被纤维蛋白鞘覆盖,30天内,大多数与CVC相关的血栓会出现。除了降低导管功能外,这些与CVC相关的血栓在15%-30%的病例中可导致血栓后综合征,在11%的病例中可导致肺栓塞(其中只有一半有症状)。CVC血栓形成的危险因素包括恶性肿瘤类型、化疗类型、CVC类型以及插入部位和导管尖端的位置,但不包括遗传性血栓形成倾向危险因素。用低分子量肝素进行全身预防性抗凝以减少CVC血栓形成的努力失败了。低剂量华法林预防仍存在争议;所有研究都存在缺陷,早期研究显示有获益,但近期研究并非如此。目前,接受CVC的患者中不到10%接受任何全身预防性治疗。虽然不建议普遍使用,但低剂量华法林可能是营养良好且肝功能正常患者的低风险治疗方法。显然,需要更多研究来证实低剂量华法林的预防性使用。需要探索更新的抗凝治疗方法,如五糖和直接凝血酶抑制剂,以解决这一主要医学问题。