Endres T, Grass R, Biewener A, Barthel S, Zwipp H
Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, TU, Carl-Gustav-Carus Universität, Dresden,
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Apr;107(4):273-84. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0742-x.
Between October 1993 and September 1999 a total of 62 tibial pilon fractures in 59 patients were treated at the Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Technical University Dresden. In a retrospective study 49 patients with 50 tibial pilon fractures (81%) could be examined an average of 28 months after injury. The purpose of this study was to compare clinically and radiographically the healing results obtained after using the Ilizarov technique in combination with minimally invasive internal fixation (group I) with those after a conventional surgical procedure (internal fixation with a plate, external fixation with or without minimally invasive internal fixation, and screw fixation exclusively, group II) and to evaluate the efficacy of the Ilizarov technique. Data analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of 43 C2/C3 fractures in Ilizarov group I (73%) than in group II (33.3%). Severe soft tissue injuries and particularly open injuries had a significantly higher incidence in Ilizarov group I (100%) than in group II (38%). Despite the high incidence of C2/C3 fractures and severe soft tissue injuries in group I, there was no incidence of pseudarthrosis or osteitis in the further course and there was no need for arthrodesis during the long-term course. After therapy with a conventional surgical technique, the incidence of osteitis was 5% and of delayed union of a fracture 2.5% and arthrodesis was necessary in 8%. A disadvantage of the Ilizarov system was the relatively frequent incidence of pin infection (45%) necessitating surgical debridement in 18%. The efficacy of the treatment of 43 C2/C3 fractures with the Ilizarov technique was obvious by a statistically significantly better Maryland Foot Score in comparison with group II. More than 87% of the patients treated with the Ilizarov technique and only 38% of the patients treated with a conventional surgical procedure obtained a very good or good score. According to these findings, the Ilizarov technique in combination with minimally invasive internal fixation is an effective method to treat complicated tibial pilon fractures with severe soft tissue trauma.
1993年10月至1999年9月期间,德累斯顿工业大学卡尔 - 古斯塔夫 - 卡鲁斯大学医院创伤与重建外科诊所共治疗了59例患者的62例胫骨平台骨折。在一项回顾性研究中,49例患有50例胫骨平台骨折(81%)的患者在受伤后平均28个月接受了检查。本研究的目的是在临床和影像学上比较采用伊里扎洛夫技术联合微创内固定(第一组)与传统手术方法(钢板内固定、有或无微创内固定的外固定以及单纯螺钉固定,第二组)后的愈合结果,并评估伊里扎洛夫技术的疗效。数据分析显示,伊里扎洛夫第一组中43例C2/C3骨折的发生率(73%)显著高于第二组(33.3%)。伊里扎洛夫第一组中严重软组织损伤,尤其是开放性损伤的发生率(100%)显著高于第二组(38%)。尽管第一组中C2/C3骨折和严重软组织损伤的发生率较高,但在后续病程中没有假关节或骨髓炎的发生,并且在长期病程中无需进行关节融合术。采用传统手术技术治疗后,骨髓炎的发生率为5%,骨折延迟愈合的发生率为2.5%,8%的患者需要进行关节融合术。伊里扎洛夫系统 的一个缺点是钢针感染的发生率相对较高(45%),18%的患者需要进行手术清创。与第二组相比,采用伊里扎洛夫技术治疗43例C2/C3骨折的疗效明显,马里兰足部评分在统计学上显著更好。采用伊里扎洛夫技术治疗的患者中超过87%获得了非常好或良好的评分,而采用传统手术方法治疗的患者中只有38%获得了这样的评分。根据这些发现,伊里扎洛夫技术联合微创内固定是治疗伴有严重软组织创伤的复杂胫骨平台骨折的有效方法。