Suppr超能文献

辅助生殖技术与卵巢癌发病率:一项荟萃分析

Assisted reproductive technology and the incidence of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kashyap Sonya, Moher David, Fung Michael Fung Kee, Rosenwaks Zev

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):785-94. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000119226.39514.1d.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the available literature regarding the relationship between assisted reproductive technology and ovarian cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Computerized search of 6 databases from 1966 (or closest) to present: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cancerlit, CINHAL, Current Contents, PubMed in process (formerly called PreMEDLINE), and MEDLINE. We collected references from the bibliographies of reviews, original research articles, content experts, and conference proceedings to find published and unpublished literature.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Case-control and cohort studies are included. The population of interest is treated infertile women, the control population is untreated infertile women, and the intervention or exposure of interest includes the following fertility medications: clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin, and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists. The primary outcome is incident, primary ovarian cancer. Three cohort and 7 case-control studies were included in the quantitative analyses.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scales were used. Two investigators independently extracted study methods, sources of bias, and outcomes. The following information was recorded: publication information, subject characteristics, intervention information and outcomes. Studies combined were sufficiently homogeneous for quantitative summary. Case-control and cohort data showed a significantly elevated risk for exposure of infertility medications and ovarian cancer in subjects who underwent assisted reproductive technology compared with general population controls (1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18 to 1.97). When cases of ovarian cancer were compared with infertile controls for exposure to infertility medications, the odds ratio (0.99; 95% CI 0.67, 1.45) was not elevated. However, cohort data comparing outcome in treated infertile patients with untreated infertile patients suggests that treated patients may tend to a lower incidence of ovarian cancer-odds ratio = 0.67 (95% CI 0.32, 1.41).

CONCLUSION

Ovarian cancer does not appear to be increased in treated infertile patients versus untreated infertile patients. Treated infertile patients may have a lower incidence of ovarian cancer than untreated infertile patients.

摘要

目的

系统评价有关辅助生殖技术与卵巢癌之间关系的现有文献。

数据来源

对1966年(或最接近的年份)至今的6个数据库进行计算机检索:考科蓝对照试验注册库、癌症文献数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、现刊目次数据库、正在处理中的PubMed(原名为PreMEDLINE)以及医学索引数据库。我们从综述、原创研究文章、内容专家和会议论文集的参考文献中收集文献,以查找已发表和未发表的文献。

研究选择方法

纳入病例对照研究和队列研究。研究对象为接受治疗的不孕女性,对照人群为未接受治疗的不孕女性,感兴趣的干预或暴露因素包括以下生育药物:枸橼酸氯米芬、促性腺激素、人绒毛膜促性腺激素以及促性腺激素释放激素激动剂。主要结局为原发性卵巢癌发病情况。三项队列研究和七项病例对照研究纳入了定量分析。

制表、整合与结果:采用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华质量评估量表。两名研究人员独立提取研究方法、偏倚来源和结局。记录了以下信息:发表信息、研究对象特征、干预信息和结局。纳入合并的研究在定量汇总方面具有充分的同质性。病例对照研究和队列研究数据显示,与普通人群对照相比,接受辅助生殖技术的受试者使用不孕药物与卵巢癌暴露风险显著升高(1.52;95%置信区间[CI]为1.18至1.97)。当将卵巢癌病例与不孕对照进行不孕药物暴露比较时,优势比(0.99;95%CI为0.67,1.45)未升高。然而,队列研究数据比较接受治疗的不孕患者与未接受治疗的不孕患者的结局表明,接受治疗的患者卵巢癌发病率可能较低——优势比 = 0.67(95%CI为0.32,1.41)。

结论

接受治疗的不孕患者与未接受治疗的不孕患者相比,卵巢癌发病率似乎并未增加。接受治疗的不孕患者卵巢癌发病率可能低于未接受治疗的不孕患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验