Foshee Vangie A, Bauman Karl E, Ennett Susan T, Linder G Fletcher, Benefield Thad, Suchindran Chirayath
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7440, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):619-24. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.619.
This study determined 4-year postintervention effects of Safe Dates on dating violence, booster effects, and moderators of the program effects.
We gathered baseline data in 10 schools that were randomly allocated to a treatment condition. We collected follow-up data 1 month after the program and then yearly thereafter for 4 years. Between the 2- and 3-year follow-ups, a randomly selected half of treatment adolescents received a booster.
Compared with controls, adolescents receiving Safe Dates reported significantly less physical, serious physical, and sexual dating violence perpetration and victimization 4 years after the program. The booster did not improve the effectiveness of Safe Dates.
Safe Dates shows promise for preventing dating violence but the booster should not be used.
本研究确定了“安全约会”项目干预后4年对约会暴力、强化效应以及项目效果调节因素的影响。
我们在10所学校收集了基线数据，这些学校被随机分配到一种治疗条件下。我们在项目结束后1个月收集随访数据，此后每年收集一次，共4年。在2年和3年随访之间，随机选择一半接受治疗的青少年接受强化干预。
与对照组相比，接受“安全约会”项目的青少年在项目结束4年后报告的身体暴力、严重身体暴力和性约会暴力的实施及受害情况明显减少。强化干预并未提高“安全约会”项目的有效性。
“安全约会”项目在预防约会暴力方面显示出前景，但不应使用强化干预。
