Smania Nicola, Corato Elisabetta, Tinazzi Michele, Montagnana Barbara, Fiaschi Antonio, Aglioti Salvatore M
Center of Functional Reeducation, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Funct Neurol. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):219-25.
The most widespread approach to rehabilitation of cervical dystonia is electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback. However, consensus is lacking regarding the true effectiveness of this technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate how cervical dystonia was influenced by two rehabilitative treatments, namely a standard biofeedback program and a novel physiotherapy program consisting of postural reeducation exercises and passive elongation of myofascial cervical structures. Both programs were consecutively administered to 4 patients with cervical dystonia. The study design was a behavioral analysis of single cases. The main outcome measures were a head realignment test, a disability questionnaire and a pain visual analogue scale (VAS). Each patient's performance was evaluated before the study and after the first and second program. Furthermore, the disability questionnaire and the pain VAS were administered 3, 6, and 9 months after the end of the treatments. The physiotherapy program showed therapeutic effects comparable to those of EMG biofeedback. Reductions of disability and of pain were still present 3-9 months after the end of the treatments. These preliminary results suggest that the physiotherapy program proposed in the present study may be a promising method for rehabilitation of cervical dystonia.
治疗颈部肌张力障碍最广泛采用的方法是肌电图(EMG)生物反馈疗法。然而,对于该技术的实际疗效,目前尚未达成共识。本研究旨在评估两种康复治疗方法对颈部肌张力障碍的影响,这两种方法分别是标准生物反馈疗法和一种新型物理治疗方案,该方案包括姿势再教育练习以及颈部肌筋膜结构的被动拉伸。这两种方案均连续应用于4例颈部肌张力障碍患者。本研究设计为单病例行为分析。主要观察指标为头部重新定位测试、残疾问卷以及疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)。在研究开始前以及在第一个和第二个方案实施后,对每位患者的表现进行评估。此外,在治疗结束后的3个月、6个月和9个月,进行残疾问卷和疼痛VAS评估。物理治疗方案显示出与EMG生物反馈疗法相当的治疗效果。在治疗结束后的3 - 9个月,残疾和疼痛程度仍持续减轻。这些初步结果表明,本研究中提出的物理治疗方案可能是一种很有前景的颈部肌张力障碍康复方法。