Roff Derek, Réale Denis
Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA.
Evolution. 2004 Jan;58(1):47-58. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01572.x.
The genetic basis of fluctuating asymmetry (FA), a measure of random deviations from perfect bilateral symmetry, has been the subject of much recent work. In this paper we compare two perspectives on the quantitative genetic analysis of FA and directional asymmetry (DA). We call these two approaches the character-state model and the environmental responsiveness model. In the former approach, the right and left sides are viewed as separate traits whose genetic coupling is manifested by the genetic correlation. This model leads to the relationship, h2(DA) = h2[(1-rA)/(1-rp)), where h2 is the heritability of each component trait (assumed to be the same), rA and rp are the genetic and phenotypic correlations between traits, respectively. Simulation shows that, under this model, the heritability of FA is considerably less than that of DA, except when heritabilities are very close to zero. The environmental responsiveness model permits genetic variance in FA even when the genetic correlation between traits is + 1. Simulation shows that under this model the heritability of FA can be uncoupled from that of DA. The additive and nonadditive components of the component (right and left) traits, their DA and FA values are estimated using a diallel cross of seven inbred lines of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Four leg measurements were made and both the individual DA and FA values and the compound measures DASUM and CFA estimated. The heritabilities of the compound measures are slightly larger than the individual estimates. Dominance variance is observed in the individual traits but predicted to be an even smaller component of the phenotypic variance than the additive genetic variance. The estimated values confirm this, although a previous study has demonstrated that dominance variance is present. Because the heritabilities of FA are generally larger than those of DA, which never exceed 0.02, the environmental responsiveness model is more consistent with the data than the character-state model. A review of other data suggests that both sources of variation might be found in some species.
波动不对称性(FA)是衡量与完美双侧对称的随机偏差的指标,其遗传基础是近期许多研究的主题。在本文中,我们比较了关于FA和方向不对称性(DA)定量遗传分析的两种观点。我们将这两种方法称为性状状态模型和环境响应模型。在前一种方法中,右侧和左侧被视为独立的性状,其遗传耦合通过遗传相关性体现。该模型得出关系:h2(DA) = h2[(1 - rA)/(1 - rp)],其中h2是每个组成性状的遗传力(假设相同),rA和rp分别是性状之间的遗传和表型相关性。模拟表明,在该模型下,FA的遗传力远低于DA,除非遗传力非常接近零。环境响应模型允许即使性状之间的遗传相关性为 +1时FA也存在遗传方差。模拟表明在该模型下FA的遗传力可以与DA的遗传力解耦。使用沙地蟋蟀(Gryllus firmus)七个近交系的双列杂交估计组成(右侧和左侧)性状的加性和非加性成分、它们的DA和FA值。进行了四项腿部测量,并估计了个体的DA和FA值以及复合测量值DASUM和CFA。复合测量值的遗传力略大于个体估计值。在个体性状中观察到显性方差,但预计其在表型方差中所占比例比加性遗传方差更小。估计值证实了这一点,尽管先前的一项研究表明存在显性方差。因为FA的遗传力通常大于DA的遗传力,DA的遗传力从未超过0.02,所以环境响应模型比性状状态模型更符合数据。对其他数据的综述表明,在某些物种中可能会发现这两种变异来源。