• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Linearity evaluation of analytical methods that count particles.

作者信息

Magari Robert T, Rodriguez Leslie

机构信息

Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, Florida 33196-2500, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004 Feb;42(2):215-21. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.039.

DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2004.039
PMID:15061364
Abstract

Linearity evaluation of an analytical method is important for both manufacturers of diagnostic devices and laboratory users. Some of the statistical assumptions for estimation and testing in linear regression are violated in analytical methods that count particles per unit of volume or/and time, leading to potential erroneous evaluation of linearity. The objective of this paper is to provide an approach for evaluating linearity in these cases. The number of counts for each concentration level has a Poisson probability distribution that is linear, second-, or higher-order polynomial function of the concentration. Maximum likelihood approach is used to estimate the parameters of the models. Deviance of a particular model and the likelihood ratio test are used to test for linearity. An evaluation of linearity of an analytical method in multiple experiments is also described. No particular changes to the standard testing protocols and data collections are necessary. There are several statistical software packages that can perform the calculations. Formulas and SAS codes presented in this article can also assist in estimation and statistical testing.

摘要

相似文献

1
Linearity evaluation of analytical methods that count particles.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004 Feb;42(2):215-21. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.039.
2
Evaluation of linearity in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室线性评估。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Jan;128(1):44-8. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-44-EOLITC.
3
Estimation of bias between 2 analytical methods at clinically important ranges.两种分析方法在临床重要范围内偏差的估计。
Lab Hematol. 2006;12(1):55-9. doi: 10.1532/LH96.05025.
4
Testing assay linearity over a pre-specified range.在预先指定的范围内测试分析方法的线性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(2):339-50. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.972513.
5
Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.1990年香港燃料含硫量限制立法的影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Aug(170):5-91.
6
On statistical evaluation of the linearity in assay validation.关于分析方法验证中线性的统计学评估。
J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(4):677-90. doi: 10.1080/10543400802071378.
7
Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays.设定诊断检测的性能目标并评估总分析误差。
Clin Chem. 2002 Jun;48(6 Pt 1):919-27.
8
Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.不一致率,一个将诊断决策与分析性能特征相结合的新概念。1. 在方法或样本系统比较以及确定决策限中的应用。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):347-55. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.055.
9
Quantification of analytical recovery in particle and microorganism enumeration methods.微粒和微生物计数方法中分析回收率的定量。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 1;44(5):1705-12. doi: 10.1021/es902237f.
10
Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.用于测量室内和室外空气中酸性颗粒的纳米薄膜探测器的现场评估。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2004 Sep(121):1-35; discussion 37-46.