• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同项目等值中0.3对数单位筛选标准的评估

Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.

作者信息

Miller G Edward, Rotou Ourania, Twing Jon S

机构信息

Division of Student Assessment, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, TX 78701-1494, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Meas. 2004;5(2):172-7.

PMID:15064536
Abstract

A number of state assessment programs that employ Rasch-based common item equating procedures estimate the equating constant with only those common items for which the two tests' Rasch item difficulty parameter estimates differ by less than 0.3 logits. The results of this study presents evidence that this practice results in an inflated probability of incorrectly dropping an item from the common item set if the number of examinees is small (e.g., 500 or less) and the reverse if the number of examinees is large (e.g., 5000 or more). An asymptotic experiment-wise error rate criterion was algebraically derived. This same criterion can also be applied to the Mantel-Haenszel statistic. Bonferroni test statistics were found to provide excellent approximations to the (asymptotically) exact test statistics.

摘要

一些采用基于拉施模型的共同项目等值程序的州评估项目,仅使用那些两个测试的拉施项目难度参数估计值相差小于0.3对数单位的共同项目来估计等值常数。本研究结果表明,如果考生数量较少(例如500名或更少),这种做法会导致从共同项目集中错误删除项目的概率虚高,而如果考生数量较多(例如5000名或更多),情况则相反。通过代数方法推导出了一个渐近实验性错误率标准。这个相同的标准也可以应用于曼特尔-亨泽尔统计量。发现邦费罗尼检验统计量能很好地近似(渐近)精确检验统计量。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.共同项目等值中0.3对数单位筛选标准的评估
J Appl Meas. 2004;5(2):172-7.
2
Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.拉施校准测试中常见项目间因项目参数漂移而产生的预期链接错误。
J Appl Meas. 2005;6(1):48-56.
3
Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
J Appl Meas. 2008;9(1):57-67.
4
Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.拉施拟合统计作为项目参数估计不变性的一种检验。
J Appl Meas. 2003;4(2):153-63.
5
Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.通过共同项目测试等值,使用改良的内德尔斯基程序验证标准设定。
J Outcome Meas. 1997;1(2):164-72.
6
An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.潜在特质理论中影响测验等值的因素研究。
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(1):25-43.
7
The effect of dropping low scores on ability estimates.
J Appl Meas. 2004;5(2):178-88.
8
A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning.一种用于检测二分类差异项目功能的通用框架和 R 包。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):847-62. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.847.
9
Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.将等值和题库建设与拉施模型相结合。
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(4):409-34.
10
Reliability and true-score measures of binary items as a function of their Rasch difficulty parameter.二分项目的信度和真分数测量与其拉施难度参数的函数关系。
J Appl Meas. 2003;4(3):222-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Outlier Detection Using t-test in Rasch IRT Equating under NEAT Design.在NEAT设计下,基于t检验的拉施IRT等值中的异常值检测
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Jan;47(1):34-47. doi: 10.1177/01466216221124045. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Application of Sampling Variance of Item Response Theory Parameter Estimates in Detecting Outliers in Common Item Equating.项目反应理论参数估计的抽样方差在共同项目等值中离群值检测中的应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Sep;46(6):529-547. doi: 10.1177/01466216221108122. Epub 2022 Jun 15.