Richardson James K, Thies Sibylle B, DeMott Trina K, Ashton-Miller James A
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):510-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52155.x.
To determine which, if any, of three inexpensive interventions improve gait regularity in patients with peripheral neuropathy (PN) while walking on an irregular surface under low-light conditions.
Observational.
University of Michigan Biomechanics Research Laboratory.
Forty-two patients with PN (20 women), mean age+/-standard deviation=64.5+/-9.7.
A straight cane, touch of a vertical surface, or semirigid ankle orthoses.
Step-width variability and range, step-time variability, and speed.
Subjects demonstrated significantly less step-width variability (mean=41.0+/-1.5, 36.9+/-1.6, 37.2+/-1.3, and 35.9+/-1.5 mm for baseline, cane, orthoses, and vertical surface, respectively; P<.0001) and range (182.7+/-7.4, 163.7+/-8.3, 164.3+/-7.4, 154.3+/-6.9 mm for baseline, cane, orthoses and vertical surface, respectively; P=.0006) with each of the interventions than under baseline conditions. Step-time variability significantly decreased with use of the orthoses and vertical surface but not the cane (P=.0001). Use of a cane, but not orthoses or vertical surface, was associated with decreased speed (0.79+/-0.03, 0.73+/-0.03, 0.79+/-0.03, 0.80+/-0.03 m/s for baseline, cane, orthoses, and vertical surface, respectively; P=.0001).
Older patients with PN demonstrate improved spatial and temporal measures of gait regularity with the use of a cane, ankle orthoses, or touch of a vertical surface while walking under challenging conditions. The decreased speed and stigma associated with the cane and uncertain availability of a vertical surface suggest that the ankle orthoses may be the most practical intervention.
确定在低光照条件下于不平整表面行走时,三种低成本干预措施中的哪一种(若有的话)能改善周围神经病变(PN)患者的步态规律性。
观察性研究。
密歇根大学的生物力学研究实验室。
42例PN患者(20名女性),平均年龄±标准差 = 64.5±9.7岁。
直手杖、触摸垂直表面或半刚性踝关节矫形器。
步幅变异性和范围、步时变异性以及速度。
与基线条件相比,使用每种干预措施时,受试者的步幅变异性(基线、手杖、矫形器和垂直表面的均值分别为41.0±1.5、36.9±1.6、37.2±1.3和35.9±1.5毫米;P <.0001)和范围(基线、手杖、矫形器和垂直表面的均值分别为182.7±7.4、163.7±8.3、164.3±7.4和154.3±6.9毫米;P =.0006)均显著降低。使用矫形器和触摸垂直表面时步时变异性显著降低,但使用手杖时未降低(P =.0001)。使用手杖会导致速度降低,但使用矫形器或触摸垂直表面则不会(基线、手杖、矫形器和垂直表面的速度分别为0.79±0.03、0.73±0.03、0.79±0.03和0.80±0.03米/秒;P =.0001)。
老年PN患者在具有挑战性的条件下行走时,使用手杖、踝关节矫形器或触摸垂直表面可改善步态规律性的空间和时间指标。手杖导致的速度降低和耻辱感以及垂直表面的可用性不确定表明,踝关节矫形器可能是最实用的干预措施。