Fleiss J L
Division of Biostatistics, Columbia University School of Public Health, New York, NY.
J Periodontal Res. 1992 Jul;27(4 Pt 2):306-13; discussion 323-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1992.tb01684.x.
Critical discussion is offered of design issues pertinent to three categories of clinical trials: efficacy trials, in which an experimental intervention is compared to an inert control, and equivalency and superiority trials, in which an experimental intervention is compared to an active control. The issues discussed are sample-size determination and power, problems in designing and analyzing multicenter trials, broad versus concentrated sampling of patients, the need (or not) for a placebo control group in an active control trial, the possible appropriateness of crossing patients over from one regimen to another, various methods of randomization, the intention-to-treat principle in repeated measurements studies, and possible logical conflicts between inferences from superiority trials and inferences from equivalency trials.
疗效试验,即将一种实验性干预措施与惰性对照进行比较;等效性试验和优效性试验,即将一种实验性干预措施与活性对照进行比较。所讨论的问题包括样本量的确定和检验效能、多中心试验设计与分析中的问题、患者的广泛抽样与集中抽样、活性对照试验中是否需要安慰剂对照组、患者从一种治疗方案交叉转换到另一种治疗方案的可能适宜性、各种随机化方法、重复测量研究中的意向性分析原则,以及优效性试验的推断与等效性试验的推断之间可能存在的逻辑冲突。