Tedesco L A, Keffer M A, Davis E L, Christersson L A
State University of New York, School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo.
J Periodontol. 1992 Jul;63(7):567-75. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.7.567.
An intervention designed to test the influence of cognitive restructuring on protective oral health behaviors was conducted with 108 patients with mild to moderate gingivitis. Subjects in the experimental group viewed slides of active, mobile bacteria taken from their mouths on 5 occasions: before and after prophylaxis and at 3 appointments, one month apart. A specially trained hygienist discussed with these participants the process of periodontal disease, the role of bacteria, and self-efficacy (self-control) for oral hygiene self-care. Both experimental and control group subjects received instruction in oral self-care procedures. Assessments of oral health using Löe and Silness' plaque and gingival indices (PI and GI) were taken throughout the study and at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Self-efficacy, oral hygiene intentions, attitudes, and values comprised the set of cognition variables. Plaque and gingival indices mean differences between groups approached significance at visit 6. Analyses were also performed using percent of gingival surfaces scored at "0" (no visible bleeding on probing). A trend occurred for group differences in percent "0" scores at visit 6, with the experimental group maintaining higher percent zeros (better health) at this 3-month follow-up. At visit 7 (9-month follow-up), PI and GI differences disappeared. No significant differences were found between groups for oral health cognitions or behavior reports over time. The data suggest that the cognitive-behavioral intervention produced a delayed relapse in protective oral self-care behaviors, and by extension, oral health status. Such a delay could be clinically relevant in promoting adherence to oral hygiene behavior between professional visits.
一项旨在测试认知重构对口腔健康保护行为影响的干预措施,对108例轻至中度牙龈炎患者进行了实施。实验组的受试者5次观看从他们口腔中采集的活动、可移动细菌的幻灯片:在预防前后以及在3次预约就诊时,每次间隔1个月。一位经过专门培训的保健员与这些参与者讨论了牙周疾病的过程、细菌的作用以及口腔卫生自我护理的自我效能(自我控制)。实验组和对照组的受试者都接受了口腔自我护理程序的指导指导。在整个研究过程中以及在3个月和6个月的随访时,使用Löe和Silness的菌斑和牙龈指数(PI和GI)对口腔健康进行了评估。自我效能、口腔卫生意图、态度和价值观构成了认知变量集。在第6次就诊时,两组之间的菌斑和牙龈指数平均差异接近显著水平。还使用在“0”分(探诊时无可见出血)的牙龈表面百分比进行了分析。在第6次就诊时,“0”分百分比的组间差异出现了一种趋势,实验组在这次3个月的随访中保持了更高的零百分比(更好的健康状况)。在第7次就诊(9个月随访)时,PI和GI差异消失。随着时间的推移,两组在口腔健康认知或行为报告方面未发现显著差异。数据表明,认知行为干预在口腔健康保护自我护理行为方面产生了延迟复发,进而在口腔健康状况方面也是如此。这种延迟在促进两次专业就诊之间对口腔卫生行为的依从性方面可能具有临床相关性。