Friedrichsen S W, Herzog A E, Christie C A
Idaho State University, Pocatello.
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Mar;67(3):348-57. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90245-6.
It has been theorized that the legalization of providers of denture care other than dentists would make dentures more affordable to and therefore more often obtained by individuals of lower socioeconomic status. The delivery of dental prostheses by nondentists (denturists) has been legalized in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Montana, and Oregon. This study compares the socioeconomic and utilization patterns of two groups of patients receiving prostheses: (1) those whose prosthetic services were provided by dentists and (2) those whose services were provided by denturists. The sample included 135 participants; 31 individuals with 54 prostheses made by denturists and 104 individuals with 165 prostheses made by dentists. Application of the chi-square test and the Hollingshead Two-Factor Index of Social Position revealed no statistically significant correlation, (p less than 0.05) between the provider-based groups and standard socioeconomic variables. The history and pattern of choice of provider as well as level of satisfaction were also remarkable for the similarity displayed by the two groups. It would appear that the two groups are actually one homogeneous group served by two levels of providers.
有一种理论认为,除牙医之外的义齿护理服务提供者合法化,会使义齿对社会经济地位较低的个人来说更能负担得起,从而使他们更经常地获得义齿。在亚利桑那州、科罗拉多州、爱达荷州、缅因州、蒙大拿州和俄勒冈州,非牙医(义齿师)提供牙修复体已被合法化。本研究比较了两组接受修复体的患者的社会经济状况和使用模式:(1)那些修复服务由牙医提供的患者,以及(2)那些服务由义齿师提供的患者。样本包括135名参与者;31名个体使用义齿师制作的54副修复体,104名个体使用牙医制作的165副修复体。卡方检验和霍林斯黑德社会地位双因素指数的应用表明,基于服务提供者的分组与标准社会经济变量之间不存在统计学上的显著相关性(p小于0.05)。两组在选择服务提供者的历史和模式以及满意度水平方面所显示出的相似性也很显著。看来这两组实际上是由两个层次的服务提供者服务的一个同质群体。