Gold Michael R, Leman Robert B, Euler David E
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec;7(4):341-4. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023134.41562.79.
There is increasing interest in the use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to manage atrial tachyarrhythmias. Although device-based shock therapy is highly effective in terminating persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias, atrial overdrive pacing may also be useful, particularly when this therapy is applied early after the onset of an arrhythmia. A dual-chamber ICD (Medtronic 7250 Jewel AF(R)) has been studied in 267 patients with drug-refractory symptomatic AF. The patients were enrolled as part of multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device to manage atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of a standard ventricular ICD indication. The device discriminates atrial tachycardia (AT) from atrial fibrillation (AF) based on cycle length and regularity, and employs multiple methods of atrial overdrive pacing as well as shocks to terminate tachyarrhythmia episodes. Patients were followed for an average of 15.8 +/- 9.3 months. A majority (63%) of patients presented with a history of persistent AF and 34% presented with a history of paroxysmal AF. The pacing therapies terminated 54% of AT episodes and 27% of AF episodes. In patients with persistent AF, 75% of the AT/AF episodes that were successfully terminated by pacing lasted <or=9 minutes. When the pacing therapies failed, episodes lasted for several hours and 50% of the episodes received at least one shock. The results of this trial suggest that pace-termination plays an important role in device-based management of atrial tachyarrhythmias. It is estimated that early pace-termination of AT/AF episodes may reduce the need for device-based shocks among patients with persistent AF by about half.
使用植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)来管理房性快速性心律失常的兴趣日益增加。尽管基于设备的电击疗法在终止持续性房性快速性心律失常方面非常有效,但心房超速起搏也可能有用,特别是当这种疗法在心律失常发作后早期应用时。一项针对267例药物难治性症状性房颤患者的双腔ICD(美敦力7250 Jewel AF(R))研究。这些患者作为多中心临床试验的一部分入组,以评估该设备在无标准心室ICD指征的情况下管理房性快速性心律失常的安全性和有效性。该设备根据周期长度和规律性区分房性心动过速(AT)和心房颤动(AF),并采用多种心房超速起搏方法以及电击来终止快速性心律失常发作。患者平均随访15.8±9.3个月。大多数(63%)患者有持续性房颤病史,34%患者有阵发性房颤病史。起搏治疗终止了54%的AT发作和27%的AF发作。在持续性房颤患者中,75%通过起搏成功终止的AT/AF发作持续时间≤9分钟。当起搏治疗失败时,发作持续数小时,50%的发作至少接受了一次电击。该试验结果表明,起搏终止在基于设备的房性快速性心律失常管理中起重要作用。据估计,早期对AT/AF发作进行起搏终止可能使持续性房颤患者中基于设备的电击需求减少约一半。