Sun Lucy, Chiu Doreen, Kowal Dianne, Simon Rachelle, Smeyne Michelle, Zukin R Suzanne, Olney John, Baudy Reinhardt, Lin Stephen
Discovery Neuroscience, Wyeth Research, CN8000, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Aug;310(2):563-70. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.066092. Epub 2004 Apr 9.
Two novel N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists with unique chemical structures, EAA-090 (2-[8,9-dioxo-2, 6-diazabicyclo[5.2.0]non-1(7)-en2-yl]ethylphosphonic acid) and EAB-318 (R-alpha-amino-5-chloro-1-(phosphonomethyl)-1H-benzimidazole-2-propanoic acid hydrochloride), were compared with CGS-19755 (Selfotel) in ligand binding, electrophysiology, and neuroprotection assays. CGS-19755, EAA-090 and EAB-318 inhibited [(3)H]3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid binding to NMDA receptors with IC(50) values of 55, 28, and 7.9 nM, respectively. All three compounds decreased the duration of spontaneous synaptic currents and inhibited NMDA-activated currents in rat hippocampal neurons. IC(50) values for inhibition of current induced by 10 microM NMDA were 795, 477, and 69 nM for CGS-19755, EAA-090, and EAB-318, respectively. The NMDA antagonists protected chick embryo retina slices and cultured rat hippocampal and cortical neurons from glutamate- and NMDA-induced neurotoxicity. In experiments in which different NMDA receptor splice variants and subtypes were expressed in Xenopus oocytes, all three antagonists preferentially blocked NMDA-elicited currents mediated by N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NR)1 splice variants containing the N-terminal insertion. They also favored NR2A-versus NR2B- or NR2C-containing NMDA receptors, with EAA-090 showing the greatest selectivity. EAA-090 was 10 times more potent at blocking NR2A-versus NR2B- or NR2C-containing NMDA receptors. In addition to being the most potent NMDA antagonist, EAB-318 inhibited alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and kainate receptors. The combination of NMDA and AMPA/kainate block enabled EAB-318 to protect neurons against ischemia induced cell death.
将两种具有独特化学结构的新型 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂 EAA-090(2-[8,9-二氧代-2,6-二氮杂双环[5.2.0]壬-1(7)-烯-2-基]乙基膦酸)和 EAB-318(R-α-氨基-5-氯-1-(膦酰基甲基)-1H-苯并咪唑-2-丙酸盐酸盐)与 CGS-19755(Selfotel)在配体结合、电生理学和神经保护试验中进行了比较。CGS-19755、EAA-090 和 EAB-318 抑制 [(3)H]3-(2-羧基哌嗪-4-基)丙基-1-膦酸与 NMDA 受体的结合,IC(50)值分别为 55、28 和 7.9 nM。这三种化合物均缩短了大鼠海马神经元自发突触电流的持续时间,并抑制了 NMDA 激活电流。对于抑制由 10 μM NMDA 诱导的电流,CGS-19755、EAA-090 和 EAB-318 的 IC(50)值分别为 795、477 和 69 nM。NMDA 拮抗剂可保护鸡胚视网膜切片以及培养的大鼠海马和皮质神经元免受谷氨酸和 NMDA 诱导的神经毒性。在非洲爪蟾卵母细胞中表达不同 NMDA 受体剪接变体和亚型的实验中,这三种拮抗剂均优先阻断由含有 N 端插入的 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NR)1 剪接变体介导的 NMDA 引发的电流。它们还更倾向于作用于含 NR2A 的 NMDA 受体而非含 NR2B 或 NR2C 的受体,其中 EAA-090 的选择性最高。EAA-090 阻断含 NR2A 的 NMDA 受体的效力比阻断含 NR2B 或 NR2C 的受体高 10 倍。除了是最有效的 NMDA 拮抗剂外,EAB-318 还抑制 α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)和海人藻酸受体。NMDA 和 AMPA/海人藻酸阻断的联合作用使 EAB-318 能够保护神经元免受缺血诱导的细胞死亡。