Suppr超能文献

运动性光幻视与运动阈值之间无相关性:一项经颅磁刺激研究。

No correlation between moving phosphene and motor thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

作者信息

Antal Andrea, Nitsche Michael A, Kincses Tamás Z, Lampe Christian, Paulus Walter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, George-August University of Göttingen, Robert Koch Strasse 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroreport. 2004 Feb 9;15(2):297-302. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200402090-00017.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the temporal stability of moving phosphenes and to assess whether moving phosphene thresholds (PTs) correlate with motor thresholds (MTs). Small moving sensations, so-called moving phosphenes, are perceived when V5, an area important for visual motion analysis, is stimulated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it is still a matter of debate if V5 phosphenes are stable sensations across measurements and if they are a reasonable index of the cortical excitability of V5. Currently, MT is more commonly used as an index of global cortical excitability. However, previous studies have indicated that stationary PTs are suitable alternatives when the primary visual cortex is stimulated by TMS. Using paired-pulse TMS, stationary and moving PTs and applying single pulse TMS, MTs were measured in 11 subjects. PTs were retested in nine subjects 5-7 days later. Stationary and moving PTs were stable within subjects across the two sessions and showed a high inter-correlation. Conversely, PTs and MTs did not correlate. Our results are in agreement with previous studies showing that excitatory measurements of one specific cortex cannot be generalized to the excitability of the whole cortex. Thus, we propose specific measures for cortices of interest: PT for visual experiments and MT for motor experiments.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查移动光幻视的时间稳定性,并评估移动光幻视阈值(PTs)是否与运动阈值(MTs)相关。当对视觉运动分析很重要的V5区域受到经颅磁刺激(TMS)刺激时,会感知到微小的移动感觉,即所谓的移动光幻视。然而,V5光幻视在多次测量中是否是稳定的感觉,以及它们是否是V5皮质兴奋性的合理指标,仍是一个有争议的问题。目前,MT更常用于作为整体皮质兴奋性的指标。然而,先前的研究表明,当TMS刺激初级视觉皮质时,静态PTs是合适的替代指标。使用配对脉冲TMS、静态和移动PTs,并应用单脉冲TMS,对11名受试者测量了MTs。9名受试者在5-7天后重新测试了PTs。在两次测试中,受试者内部的静态和移动PTs是稳定的,并且显示出高度的相互相关性。相反,PTs和MTs不相关。我们的结果与先前的研究一致,表明对一个特定皮质的兴奋性测量不能推广到整个皮质的兴奋性。因此,我们针对感兴趣的皮质提出了具体的测量方法:视觉实验用PT,运动实验用MT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验