Suppr超能文献

机械通气辅助排痰对病情稳定的肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的疗效

Efficacy of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in medically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

作者信息

Sancho Jesús, Servera Emilio, Díaz Juan, Marín Julio

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Chest. 2004 Apr;125(4):1400-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1400.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine under what circumstances the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) can generate clinically effective expiratory flows for airway clearance (> 2.7 L/s) for clinically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Twenty-six consecutive patients with ALS were studied, 15 with severe bulbar dysfunction. Using a pneumotachograph and with the aid of an oronasal mask, we measured FVC, FEV(1), peak cough flow (PCF), maximum insufflation capacity (MIC), PCF generated from a maximum insufflation MIC (PCFMIC), and PCF generated by MI-E (PCFMI-E). MI-E was delivered at +/- 40 cm H(2)O. Maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximum expiratory pressure (PEmax) at the mouth were also measured.

RESULTS

Although both groups had a similar time from ALS symptom onset to diagnosis, statistical differences (p < 0.05) were found between nonbulbar and bulbar patients in lung function and cough capacity parameters: FVC, 2.58 +/- 1.24 L vs 1.62 +/- 0.74 L; FEV(1), 2.26 +/- 1.18 L vs 1.54 +/- 0.69 L; PImax, - 93.45 +/- 47.47 cm H(2)O vs - 3.64 +/- 25.07 cm H(2)O; PEmax, 140.45 +/- 75.98 cm H(2)O vs 69.93 +/- 32.14 cm H(2)O; MIC, 3.02 +/- 1.22 L vs 1.97 +/- 0.75 L; PCF, 5.91 +/- 2.55 L/s vs 3.42 +/- 1.44 L/s; PCFMIC, 6.68 +/- 2.71 L/s vs 4.00 +/- 1.48 L/s; and PCFMI-E, 4.34 +/- 0.82 L/s vs 3.35 +/- 0.77 L/s. Four patients with bulbar dysfunction and MIC > 1 L had PCFMI-E < 2.7 L/s. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed PCFMIC of <or= 2.7 L/s predicting those patients with PCFMI-E < 2.7 L/s. The ROC curve analysis showed PCFMIC > 4 L/s predicting those patients with PCFMIC greater than PCFMI-E.

CONCLUSION

MI-E is able to generate clinically effective PCFMI-E (> 2.7 L/s) for stable patients with ALS, except for those with bulbar dysfunction who also have a MIC > 1 L and PCFMIC <2.7 L/s who probably have severe dynamic collapse of the upper airways during the exsufflation cycle. Clinically stable patients with mild respiratory dysfunction and PCFMIC > 4 L/s might not benefit from MI-E except during an acute respiratory illness.

摘要

目的

确定在何种情况下,对于临床症状稳定的肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者,使用机械吸气-呼气(MI-E)能产生临床上有效的呼气流量用于气道清理(>2.7升/秒)。

材料与方法

对26例连续的ALS患者进行研究,其中15例有严重延髓功能障碍。使用呼吸流速仪并借助口鼻面罩,我们测量了用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)、峰值咳嗽流量(PCF)、最大吸气容量(MIC)、由最大吸气MIC产生的PCF(PCFMIC)以及由MI-E产生的PCF(PCFMI-E)。MI-E以±40厘米水柱的压力进行。还测量了口腔处的最大吸气压力(PImax)和最大呼气压力(PEmax)。

结果

尽管两组从ALS症状出现到诊断的时间相似,但在肺功能和咳嗽能力参数方面,非延髓型和延髓型患者之间存在统计学差异(p<0.05):FVC,2.58±1.24升对1.62±0.74升;FEV₁,2.26±1.18升对1.54±0.69升;PImax,-93.45±47.47厘米水柱对-3.64±25.07厘米水柱;PEmax,140.45±75.98厘米水柱对69.93±32.14厘米水柱;MIC,3.02±1.22升对1.97±0.75升;PCF,5.91±2.55升/秒对3.42±1.44升/秒;PCFMIC,6.68±2.71升/秒对4.00±1.48升/秒;以及PCFMI-E,4.34±0.82升/秒对3.35±0.77升/秒。4例有延髓功能障碍且MIC>1升的患者PCFMI-E<2.7升/秒。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,PCFMIC≤2.7升/秒可预测那些PCFMI-E<2.7升/秒的患者。ROC曲线分析显示,PCFMIC>4升/秒可预测那些PCFMIC大于PCFMI-E的患者。

结论

对于临床症状稳定的ALS患者,MI-E能够产生临床上有效的PCFMI-E(>2.7升/秒),但对于那些有延髓功能障碍且MIC>1升且PCFMIC<2.7升/秒的患者除外,这类患者在呼气阶段可能存在上呼吸道严重动态塌陷。临床症状稳定且有轻度呼吸功能障碍且PCFMIC>4升/秒的患者,可能除了在急性呼吸道疾病期间外,无法从MI-E中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验