Pincus T, Koch G, Lei H, Mangal B, Sokka T, Moskowitz R, Wolfe F, Gibofsky A, Simon L, Zlotnick S, Fort J G
Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 203 Oxford House, Box 5, Nashville, TN 37232-4500, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Aug;63(8):931-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.020313. Epub 2004 Apr 13.
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is recommended as the initial pharmacological treatment for knee or hip osteoarthritis. However, survey and clinical trial data indicate greater efficacy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 specific inhibitors.
Two randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover multicentre clinical trials, Patient Preference for Placebo, Acetaminophen or Celecoxib Efficacy Studies (PACES).
Osteoarthritis of knee or hip.
"Wash out" of treatment; randomisation; 6 weeks of celecoxib 200 mg/day, acetaminophen 1000 mg four times a day, or placebo; second "wash out;" crossover to 6 weeks of second treatment.
Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue pain scale, patient preference between two treatments.
Celecoxib was more efficacious than acetaminophen in both periods in both studies; WOMAC and pain scale scores differed at p<0.05 in period II and both periods combined of PACES-a and in periods I and II and both periods combined in PACES-b, but not in period I of PACES-a. Acetaminophen was more efficacious than placebo, generally p<0.05 in PACES-b, and >0.05 in PACES-a. Patient preferences were 53% celecoxib v 24% acetaminophen in PACES-a (p<0.001) and 50% v 32% in PACES-b (p = 0.009); 37% acetaminophen v 28% placebo in PACES-a (p = 0.340) and 48% v 24% in PACES-b (p = 0.007). No clinically or statistically significant differences were seen in adverse events or tolerability among the three treatment groups.
Greater efficacy was seen for celecoxib v acetaminophen v placebo, while adverse events and tolerability were similar. Variation in results and statistical significance in the two different trials are of interest.
对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)被推荐作为膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎的初始药物治疗。然而,调查和临床试验数据表明非甾体抗炎药和环氧化酶 -2 特异性抑制剂疗效更佳。
两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉多中心临床试验,即患者对安慰剂、对乙酰氨基酚或塞来昔布疗效的偏好研究(PACES)。
膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎患者。
洗脱期治疗;随机分组;接受 6 周的塞来昔布 200 毫克/天、对乙酰氨基酚 1000 毫克每日四次或安慰剂治疗;第二次洗脱期;交叉接受第二种治疗 6 周。
西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、视觉模拟疼痛量表、患者对两种治疗的偏好。
在两项研究的两个阶段中,塞来昔布均比对乙酰氨基酚更有效;在 PACES -a 的第二阶段以及两个阶段合并时,以及 PACES -b 的第一阶段和第二阶段以及两个阶段合并时,WOMAC 和疼痛量表评分差异 p<0.05,但在 PACES -a 的第一阶段无差异。对乙酰氨基酚比安慰剂更有效,在 PACES -b 中一般 p<0.05,在 PACES -a 中>0.05。在 PACES -a 中,患者对塞来昔布的偏好为 53%,对乙酰氨基酚为 24%(p<0.001),在 PACES -b 中为 50%对 32%(p = 0.009);在 PACES -a 中,对乙酰氨基酚为 37%,安慰剂为 28%(p = 0.340),在 PACES -b 中为 48%对 24%(p = 0.007)。三个治疗组在不良事件或耐受性方面未观察到临床或统计学上的显著差异。
塞来昔布比对乙酰氨基酚和安慰剂疗效更佳,而不良事件和耐受性相似。两项不同试验结果的差异及统计学意义值得关注。