Suppr超能文献

RETHINK 研究方案:一项随机、双盲、平行分组、非劣效性临床试验,比较对乙酰氨基酚和 NSAIDs 治疗髋和膝关节骨关节炎老年慢性疼痛的疗效。

Protocol for the RETHINK study: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing acetaminophen and NSAIDs for treatment of chronic pain in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukuoka Orthopaedic Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e068220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068220.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In patients with chronic pain, oral analgesics are essential treatment options to manage pain appropriately, improve activities of daily living abilities and achieve a higher quality of life (QOL). It is desirable to select analgesics for elderly patients based on comparative data on analgesic effect and risk of adverse events; however, there are few comparative studies so far. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the efficacy and safety of acetaminophen are non-inferior to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of chronic pain associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee in elderly patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a multicentre, randomised controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the analgesic effect and adverse events between acetaminophen or NSAIDs (loxoprofen or celecoxib). A total of 400 elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee will be recruited from five institutions in Japan. Patients of 65 years or older with osteoarthritis-related pain will be registered and randomly assigned to acetaminophen, loxoprofen or celecoxib with 2:1:1 allocation. The primary endpoint is change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) item 3 (worst pain) score from baseline to week 8. The secondary endpoints are BPI item 3 score change from baseline to week 4, health-related QOL measured by Short Form-8 Health Survey, and occurrence of adverse events including gastrointestinal disorders and abnormal liver function. Data will be analysed in accordance with a predefined statistical analysis plan.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol was approved by the Kyushu University Hospital Certified Institutional Review Board for Clinical Trials on 28 January 2021 (KD2020004) and the chief executive of each participating hospital. The results of the study will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals, and the main findings will be presented at international scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs071200112.

摘要

介绍

在慢性疼痛患者中,口服镇痛药是适当管理疼痛、提高日常生活能力和实现更高生活质量(QOL)的重要治疗选择。根据镇痛效果和不良反应风险的比较数据为老年患者选择镇痛药是理想的;然而,到目前为止,比较研究很少。本研究的目的是确定对乙酰氨基酚在治疗髋膝关节骨关节炎相关慢性疼痛方面的疗效和安全性是否不亚于非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。

方法和分析

这是一项多中心、随机对照、双盲、平行组研究,旨在比较对乙酰氨基酚或 NSAIDs(洛索洛芬或塞来昔布)在治疗老年髋膝关节骨关节炎患者慢性疼痛方面的镇痛效果和不良反应。将从日本的五家机构招募 400 名老年髋膝关节骨关节炎患者。65 岁及以上、有骨关节炎相关疼痛的患者将被登记并随机分配到对乙酰氨基酚、洛索洛芬或塞来昔布组,分配比例为 2:1:1。主要终点是从基线到第 8 周时Brief Pain Inventory(BPI)项目 3(最痛)评分的变化。次要终点是从基线到第 4 周时 BPI 项目 3 评分的变化、使用 Short Form-8 Health Survey 测量的健康相关生活质量,以及胃肠道疾病和肝功能异常等不良反应的发生情况。将根据预先设定的统计分析计划分析数据。

伦理和传播

本研究方案于 2021 年 1 月 28 日获得九州大学医院临床试验认证机构审查委员会(KD2020004)和每个参与医院的首席执行官的批准。该研究的结果将提交给国际同行评议期刊,并将在国际科学会议上介绍主要发现。

试验注册号

jRCTs071200112。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556b/9923306/7030c14a46a1/bmjopen-2022-068220f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验