改进机构审查委员会的决策流程。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Improving the decision processes of institutional review boards.

作者信息

Wagner Todd H

出版信息

JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1698; author reply 1698-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1698-b.

DOI:10.1001/jama.291.14.1698-b

PMID:15082694

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Improving the decision processes of institutional review boards.

JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1698; author reply 1698-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1698-b.

Deputizing institutional review boards to police (audit?) biomedical research.

J Leg Med. 2004 Sep;25(3):267-93; discussion 295-301. doi: 10.1080/01947640490496962.

Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials.

Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597685. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test.

J Med Ethics. 2007 Aug;33(8):481-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014043.

The clinical research process: building a system in harmony with its users.

Cancer Treat Res. 2007;132:275-90. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-33225-3_15.

Considerations in the evaluation and determination of minimal risk in pragmatic clinical trials.

Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):485-93. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597687. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Is risky pediatric research without prospect of direct benefit ever justified?

Am J Bioeth. 2007 Mar;7(3):12-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160601171606.

Commentary on C Zaslawski and S Davis, 'The ethics of complementary and alternative medicine research'.

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2005 Jul;24(3):62-6.

US clinical-research system in need of review.

Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):7. doi: 10.1038/498007a.

Ethics and epistemology of accurate prediction in clinical research.

J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul;41(7):559-62. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101868. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

Institutional review boards - a mixed blessing.

Int Arch Med. 2011 Jun 20;4:19. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-4-19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Improving the decision processes of institutional review boards.

JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1698; author reply 1698-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1698-b.

Deputizing institutional review boards to police (audit?) biomedical research.

J Leg Med. 2004 Sep;25(3):267-93; discussion 295-301. doi: 10.1080/01947640490496962.

Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials.

Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597685. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test.

J Med Ethics. 2007 Aug;33(8):481-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014043.

The clinical research process: building a system in harmony with its users.

Cancer Treat Res. 2007;132:275-90. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-33225-3_15.

Considerations in the evaluation and determination of minimal risk in pragmatic clinical trials.

Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):485-93. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597687. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Is risky pediatric research without prospect of direct benefit ever justified?

Am J Bioeth. 2007 Mar;7(3):12-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160601171606.

Commentary on C Zaslawski and S Davis, 'The ethics of complementary and alternative medicine research'.

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2005 Jul;24(3):62-6.

US clinical-research system in need of review.

Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):7. doi: 10.1038/498007a.

Ethics and epistemology of accurate prediction in clinical research.

J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul;41(7):559-62. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101868. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

Institutional review boards - a mixed blessing.

Int Arch Med. 2011 Jun 20;4:19. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-4-19.