Gross Douglas P, Battié Michele C
Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):920-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00020.
Historical cohort study.
We investigated the ability of the Isernhagen Work Systems' Functional Capacity Evaluation to predict sustained recovery.
Functional Capacity Evaluation is commonly used to determine readiness or ability for safe return to work following musculoskeletal injury, implying a low risk of future recurrence or "reinjury." However, this theoretical construct has not yet been tested.
Workers' compensation claimants who underwent Functional Capacity Evaluation following low back injury and subsequently demonstrated recovery in the form of suspension of total temporary disability benefits or claim closure were studied. The number of failed tasks and performance on the floor-to-waist lift task in the protocol were used as indicators of Functional Capacity Evaluation performance. Indicators of sustained recovery included whether or not total temporary disability benefits restarted, the claim was reopened, or a new back claim was filed. Logistic regression was used to determine the prognostic effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation alone and after controlling for suspected confounding variables.
Overall, 46 of 226 patients (20%) experienced a recurrent back-related event within the year following Functional Capacity Evaluation. Opposite to the initial hypothesis, a lower number of failed Functional Capacity Evaluation tasks was consistently associated with higher risk of recurrence after controlling for potential confounding variables. Performance on the floor-to-waist lift task was not related to future recurrence.
Contrary to Functional Capacity Evaluation theory, better Functional Capacity Evaluation performance as indicated by a lower number of failed tasks was associated with higher risk of recurrence. The validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation's purported ability to identify claimants who are "safe" to return to work is suspect.
回顾性队列研究。
我们调查了伊瑟恩哈根工作系统功能能力评估预测持续恢复的能力。
功能能力评估通常用于确定肌肉骨骼损伤后安全重返工作岗位的准备情况或能力,这意味着未来复发或“再次受伤”的风险较低。然而,这一理论构想尚未得到验证。
对因腰伤接受功能能力评估,随后以暂停全部临时残疾福利或结案形式显示恢复的工伤索赔者进行研究。方案中失败任务的数量和腰到地抬举任务的表现被用作功能能力评估表现的指标。持续恢复的指标包括全部临时残疾福利是否重新开始、索赔是否重新开启或是否提出新的背部索赔。使用逻辑回归来确定仅功能能力评估以及在控制可疑混杂变量后的预后效果。
总体而言,226名患者中有46名(20%)在功能能力评估后的一年内经历了与背部相关的复发事件。与最初的假设相反,在控制潜在混杂变量后,功能能力评估失败任务数量越少,复发风险越高。腰到地抬举任务的表现与未来复发无关。
与功能能力评估理论相反,以失败任务数量越少表示的更好的功能能力评估表现与更高的复发风险相关。功能能力评估声称能够识别“安全”重返工作岗位的索赔者这一能力的有效性值得怀疑。