Haley Stephen M, Coster Wendy J, Andres Patricia L, Kosinski Mark, Ni Pengsheng
Research and Training Center on Measuring Rehabilitation Outcomes, Center for Rehabilitation Effectiveness, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Apr;85(4):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.097.
To compare simulated short-form and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) scores to scores obtained from complete item sets for each of the 3 domains of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC).
Prospective study.
Six postacute health care networks in the greater Boston metropolitan area, including inpatient acute rehabilitation, transitional care units, home care, and outpatient services.
A convenience sample of 485 adult volunteers who were receiving skilled rehabilitation services.
Not applicable.
Inpatient and community-based short forms and CAT applications were developed for each of 3 activity domains (physical & mobility, personal care & instrumental, applied cognition) using item pools constructed from new items and items from existing postacute care instruments.
Simulated CAT scores correlated highly with score estimates from the total item pool in each domain (4- and 6-item CAT r range,.90-.95; 10-item CAT r range,.96-.98). Scores on the 10-item short forms constructed for inpatient and community settings also provided good estimates of the AM-PAC item pool scores for the physical & movement and personal care & instrumental domains, but were less consistent in the applied cognition domain. Confidence intervals around individual scores were greater in the short forms than for the CATs.
Accurate scoring estimates for AM-PAC domains can be obtained with either the setting-specific short forms or the CATs. The strong relationship between CAT and item pool scores can be attributed to the CAT's ability to select specific items to match individual responses. The CAT may have additional advantages over short forms in practicality, efficiency, and the potential for providing more precise scoring estimates for individuals.
比较急性后期护理活动量表(AM-PAC)三个领域中模拟简表和计算机自适应测试(CAT)的分数与完整项目集所得分数。
前瞻性研究。
大波士顿都会区的六个急性后期医疗保健网络,包括住院急性康复、过渡护理单元、家庭护理和门诊服务。
485名接受专业康复服务的成年志愿者的便利样本。
不适用。
针对三个活动领域(身体与活动能力、个人护理与工具性活动、应用认知)中的每一个领域,使用从新项目和现有急性后期护理工具中的项目构建的项目库,开发住院和社区简表以及CAT应用程序。
模拟CAT分数与每个领域总项目库的分数估计高度相关(4项和6项CAT的r范围为0.90 - 0.95;10项CAT的r范围为0.96 - 0.98)。为住院和社区环境构建的10项简表的分数,对于身体与活动以及个人护理与工具性领域也能很好地估计AM-PAC项目库分数,但在应用认知领域不太一致。简表中个体分数的置信区间比CAT的更大。
使用特定环境简表或CAT都可以获得AM-PAC领域的准确分数估计。CAT与项目库分数之间的强关系可归因于CAT能够选择特定项目以匹配个体反应。在实用性、效率以及为个体提供更精确分数估计的潜力方面,CAT可能比简表具有更多优势。