Suppr超能文献

西酞普兰与新型抗抑郁药过量服用后的比较毒性。

Comparative toxicity of citalopram and the newer antidepressants after overdose.

作者信息

Kelly C A, Dhaun N, Laing W J, Strachan F E, Good A M, Bateman D N

机构信息

Scottish Poisons Information Bureau, Royal Infirmary, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(1):67-71. doi: 10.1081/clt-120028747.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the toxicity of citalopram, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and nefazadone after overdose.

METHODS

Two-year retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted to the toxicology unit of Edinburgh Royal Infirmary. Outcome measure included physiological variables, ECG recordings, peak creatine kinase, development of arrhythmias, seizure, tremor or agitation, and the need for admission to a critical care facility.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients were studied. Venlafaxine was associated with a significantly higher pulse rate (p < 0.0001) and tremor (p = 0.007) than other antidepressants. Citalopram was associated with a significantly longer QT interval on ECG recording (p < 0.0001) but mean QTc durations were not significantly different between all drugs studied. No arrhythmias were recorded. Only venlafaxine and citalopram caused seizures and were associated with the need for admission to Intensive Care, but there was no significant difference between them.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirtazapine and nefazadone appear safe in overdose and were associated with minimal features of neurological or cardiovascular toxicity. Citalopram is more likely to cause QT prolongation but other features of cardiovascular toxicity were uncommon. Both citalopram and venlafaxine are proconvulsants. Venlafaxine also causes more frequent features of the serotonin syndrome.

摘要

目的

比较过量服用西酞普兰、文拉法辛、米氮平和奈法唑酮后的毒性。

方法

对爱丁堡皇家医院毒理学病房连续收治的患者进行为期两年的回顾性研究。观察指标包括生理变量、心电图记录、肌酸激酶峰值、心律失常的发生、癫痫发作、震颤或躁动,以及入住重症监护病房的需求。

结果

共研究了225例患者。与其他抗抑郁药相比,文拉法辛与显著更高的脉搏率(p < 0.0001)和震颤(p = 0.007)相关。西酞普兰与心电图记录上显著更长的QT间期相关(p < 0.0001),但在所有研究药物之间,平均QTc间期无显著差异。未记录到心律失常。只有文拉法辛和西酞普兰引起癫痫发作,并与入住重症监护病房的需求相关,但两者之间无显著差异。

结论

米氮平和奈法唑酮过量服用时似乎安全,且与神经或心血管毒性的最小特征相关。西酞普兰更有可能导致QT延长,但心血管毒性的其他特征并不常见。西酞普兰和文拉法辛都是促惊厥剂。文拉法辛还更频繁地引发血清素综合征的特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验