Peltola Mirja A, Seppänen Tapio, Mäkikallio Timo H, Huikuri Heikki V
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2004 Apr;9(2):127-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2004.92531.x.
Premature beats (PBs) have been considered as artifacts producing a bias in the traditional analysis of heart rate (HR) variability. We assessed the effects and significance of PBs on fractal scaling exponents in healthy subjects and patients with a recent myocardial infarction (AMI).
Artificial PBs were first generated into a time series of pure sinus beats in 20 healthy subjects and 20 post-AMI patients. Thereafter, a case-control approach was used to compare the prognostic significance of edited and nonedited fractal scaling exponents in a random elderly population and in a post-AMI population. Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) was used to measure the short-term (alpha1) and long-term (alpha2) fractal scaling exponents.
Artificial PBs caused a more pronounced reduction of alpha1 value among the post-AMI patients than the healthy subjects, for example, if > 0.25% of the beats were premature a > 25% decrease in the alpha1 was observed in post-AMI patients, but 4% of the premature beats were needed to cause a 25% reduction in alpha1 in healthy subjects. Both edited (1.01 +/- 0.31 vs 1.19 +/- 0.27, P < 0.01) and unedited alpha1 (0.71 +/- 0.33 vs 0.89 +/- 0.36, P < 0.05) differed between the patients who died (n = 42) and those who survived (n = 42) after an AMI. In the general population, only unedited alpha1 differed significantly between survivors and those who died (0.96 +/- 0.19 vs 0.83 +/- 0.27, P < 0.05).
Unedited premature beats result in an increase in the randomness of short-term R-R interval dynamics, particularly in post-AMI patients. Premature beats must not necessarily be edited when fractal analysis is used for risk stratification.
早搏(PBs)在传统心率(HR)变异性分析中被视为会产生偏差的伪差。我们评估了早搏对健康受试者和近期心肌梗死(AMI)患者分形标度指数的影响及意义。
首先在20名健康受试者和20名AMI后患者的纯窦性心律时间序列中生成人工早搏。此后,采用病例对照方法比较在随机老年人群和AMI后人群中编辑和未编辑的分形标度指数的预后意义。采用去趋势波动分析(DFA)测量短期(α1)和长期(α2)分形标度指数。
人工早搏导致AMI后患者的α1值降低比健康受试者更明显,例如,如果>0.25%的心跳为早搏,AMI后患者的α1值会降低>25%,但健康受试者需要4%的早搏才能使α1降低25%。在AMI后死亡的患者(n = 42)和存活的患者(n = 42)之间,编辑后的α1(1.01±0.31对1.19±0.27,P < 0.01)和未编辑后的α1(0.71±0.33对0.89±0.36,P < 0.05)均有差异。在普通人群中,仅未编辑后的α1在存活者和死亡者之间有显著差异(0.96±\u200b\u200b0.19对0.83±0.27,P < 0.05)。
未编辑的早搏会导致短期R-R间期动态的随机性增加,尤其是在AMI后患者中。当使用分形分析进行风险分层时,早搏不一定必须进行编辑。