Russow Rolf, Veste Maik, Littmann Thomas
Department of Soil Sciences, UFZ Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle, Theodor-Lieser Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany.
Isotopes Environ Health Stud. 2004 Mar;40(1):57-67. doi: 10.1080/10256010310001646554.
The variation of the natural 15N abundance is often used to evaluate the origin of nitrogen or the pathways of N input into ecosystems. We tried to use this approach to assess the main input pathways of nitrogen into the sand dune area of the north-western Negev Desert (Israel). The following two pathways are the main sources for nitrogen input into the system: i. Biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by cyanobacteria present in biological crusts and by N2-fixing vascular plants (e.g. the shrub Retama raetam); ii. Atmospheric input of nitrogen by wet deposition with rainfall, dry deposition of dust containing N compounds, and gaseous deposition. Samples were taken from selected environmental compartments such as biological crusts, sand underneath these crusts (down to a depth of 90 cm), N2-fixing and non-N2-fixing plants, atmospheric bulk deposition as well as soil from arable land north of the sandy area in three field campaigns in March 1998, 1999 and 2000. The delta15N values measured were in the following ranges: grass -2.5/1000 to +1.5/1000; R. reatam: +0.5/1000 to +4.5/1000; non-N2-fixing shrubs +1/1000 to +7/1000; sand beneath the biological crusts +4/1000 to +20/1000 (soil depth 2-90 cm); and arable land to the north up to 10/1000. Thus, the natural 15N abundance of the different N pools varies significantly. Accordingly, it should be feasible to assess different input pathways from the various 15N abundances of nitrogen. For example, the biological N fixation rates of the Fabaceae shrub R. reatam from the 15N abundances measured were calculated to be 46-86% of biomass N derived from the atmosphere. The biological crusts themselves generally show slight negative 15N values (-3/1000 to -0.5/1000), which can be explained by biological N fixation. However, areas with a high share of lichens, which are unable to fix atmospheric nitrogen, show very negative values down to -10/1000. The atmospheric N bulk deposition, which amounts to 1.9-3.8 kg N/hayr, has a 15N abundance between 4.4/1000 and 11.6/1000 and is likely to be caused by dust from the arable land to the north. Thus, it cannot be responsible for the very negative values of lichens measured either. There must be an additional N input from the atmosphere with negative delta15N values, e.g. gaseous N forms (NOx, NH3). To explain these conflicting findings, detailed information is still needed on the wet, particulate and gaseous atmospheric deposition of nitrogen.
天然氮-15丰度的变化常被用于评估氮的来源或氮进入生态系统的途径。我们试图用这种方法来评估氮进入以色列内盖夫沙漠西北部沙丘地区的主要输入途径。以下两种途径是该系统氮输入的主要来源:i. 生物结皮中的蓝细菌和固氮维管植物(如灌木骆驼刺)对大气氮的生物固定;ii. 降雨的湿沉降、含氮化合物粉尘的干沉降和气态沉降导致的大气氮输入。在1998年3月、1999年和2000年的三次野外考察中,从选定的环境区室采集了样本,如生物结皮、结皮下的沙子(深度达90厘米)、固氮和非固氮植物、大气总沉降物以及沙地以北耕地上的土壤。测得的δ15N值范围如下:草:-2.5‰至+1.5‰;骆驼刺:+0.5‰至+4.5‰;非固氮灌木:+1‰至+7‰;生物结皮下的沙子:+4‰至+20‰(土壤深度2 - 90厘米);以及北部耕地最高达10‰。因此,不同氮库的天然氮-15丰度差异显著。相应地,根据氮的不同15N丰度来评估不同的输入途径应该是可行的。例如,根据测得的15N丰度计算出豆科灌木骆驼刺的生物固氮率占来自大气的生物量氮的46 - 86%。生物结皮本身通常显示出轻微的负15N值(-3‰至-0.5‰),这可以用生物固氮来解释。然而,地衣占比高且无法固定大气氮的区域显示出非常负的值,低至-10‰。大气总氮沉降量为1.9 - 3.8千克氮/公顷·年,其15N丰度在4.4‰至11.6‰之间,可能是由北部耕地上的沙尘引起的。因此,它也不可能是测得的地衣非常负的值的原因。大气中肯定还有δ15N值为负的额外氮输入,例如气态氮形式(氮氧化物、氨)。为了解释这些相互矛盾的发现,仍需要关于氮的湿沉降、颗粒沉降和气态沉降的详细信息。