Klopfenstein Jeffrey D, Kim Louis J, Feiz-Erfan Iman, Hott Jonathan S, Goslar Pam, Zabramski Joseph M, Spetzler Robert F
Division of Neurological Surgery, Department of Trauma, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013-4496, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2004 Feb;100(2):225-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.2.0225.
The goal of this study was to compare rapid and gradual weaning from external ventricular drainage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in a prospective, randomized trial.
Between December 2001 and December 2002, 81 patients with aneurysmal SAH in whom external ventricular drains (EVDs) had been placed were enrolled in the study: 41 patients were randomized to the rapidly weaned group and 40 were randomized to the gradually weaned group. The two groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, posterior aneurysm location, Fisher grade, Hunt and Hess grade, intraventricular hemorrhage on admission, and hydrocephalus on admission. Rapid weaning was defined as weaning that occurred within 24 hours with immediate closure of the EVD, whereas gradual weaning took place over a 96-hour period with daily, sequential height elevations of the EVD system followed by drain closure for 24 hours. All patients in whom EVD weaning failed underwent shunt placement. Rates of shunt implantation, days in the intensive care unit (ICU), and overall duration of hospitalization were compared. There was no significant difference in rates of shunt implantation between the rapidly weaned (63.4%) and gradually weaned (62.5%) groups. Nevertheless, patients in the gradually weaned group spent a mean of 2.8 more days in the ICU (p = 0.0002) and 2.4 more days in the hospital (p = 0.0314) than patients in the rapidly weaned group.
Compared with rapid weaning, gradual, multistep EVD weaning provided no advantage to patients with aneurysmal SAH in preventing the need for long-term shunt placement and prolonged ICU and hospital stays.
本研究的目的是在一项前瞻性随机试验中,比较动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者从外部脑室引流快速撤管和逐步撤管的效果。
在2001年12月至2002年12月期间,81例已放置外部脑室引流管(EVD)的动脉瘤性SAH患者纳入本研究:41例患者随机分为快速撤管组,40例患者随机分为逐步撤管组。两组在年龄、性别、后交通动脉瘤位置、Fisher分级、Hunt和Hess分级、入院时脑室内出血情况以及入院时脑积水情况方面匹配良好。快速撤管定义为在24小时内撤管并立即关闭EVD,而逐步撤管则在96小时内进行,每天依次升高EVD系统高度,随后关闭引流管24小时。所有EVD撤管失败的患者均接受分流术。比较分流植入率、重症监护病房(ICU)住院天数和总住院时间。快速撤管组(63.4%)和逐步撤管组(62.5%)的分流植入率无显著差异。然而,逐步撤管组患者在ICU的平均住院天数比快速撤管组多2.8天(p = 0.0002),住院天数多2.4天(p = 0.0314)。
与快速撤管相比,逐步、多步骤的EVD撤管在预防动脉瘤性SAH患者长期分流置入需求以及缩短ICU和住院时间方面对患者没有优势。