West Patrick, Sweeting Helen
MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(1):13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.004.
Many studies report few socioeconomic (SES) differences in health in youth, a pattern contrasting with that of health inequalities in childhood and adulthood. This paper focuses on the child-youth transition to examine the hypothesis of equalisation in health over this period. Specifically, we test two hypotheses: (a) that equalisation is more likely for health state measures (physical and malaise symptoms and accidents) than health status ([limiting] longstanding illness and self-rated health) or health potential (height), and (b) that the patterning of health over this period is similar between occupational (social class) and non-occupational (deprivation, housing tenure and family affluence) SES measures. Data are derived from the West of Scotland 11 to 16 cohort, followed from late childhood (aged 11) through early (13) to mid (15) adolescence. The results showed very little evidence of SES differences in (limiting) longstanding illness at any age for both sexes, while self-rated health exhibited some differentiation, and height (as expected) consistent gradients throughout. By contrast, among males evidence of equalisation was found for both physical and malaise symptoms and pedestrian road traffic accidents (RTAs). Among females, equalisation was confined to specific physical symptoms, pedestrian RTAs, sports injuries and burns/scalds, while for malaise symptoms a reverse gradient at age 11 strengthened with age. These patterns were generally unaffected by the SES measure used. We conclude that while some of the evidence is consistent with the equalisation hypothesis, it needs extending to accommodate patterns of no SES differences, and particularly reverse gradients, in childhood. These patterns may reflect the increasingly pervasive influence of youth culture, suggesting that in the UK the boundary between childhood and youth should be set at an earlier age. This in turn suggests that international comparisons have considerable analytic potential for identifying the conditions under which equalisation does and does not occur.
许多研究报告称,青少年健康方面的社会经济差异较少,这一模式与儿童期和成年期的健康不平等情况形成对比。本文聚焦于儿童到青少年的过渡阶段,以检验这一时期健康平等化的假设。具体而言,我们检验两个假设:(a)健康状态指标(身体和不适症状及事故)比健康状况([受限的]长期疾病和自评健康)或健康潜力(身高)更有可能实现平等化;(b)在此期间,职业(社会阶层)和非职业(贫困、住房保有形式和家庭富裕程度)社会经济指标的健康模式相似。数据来自苏格兰西部11至16岁队列研究,该队列从儿童晚期(11岁)开始跟踪,历经青少年早期(13岁)至中期(15岁)。结果显示,无论男女,在任何年龄,(受限的)长期疾病方面几乎没有社会经济差异的证据,而自评健康表现出一定差异,身高(正如预期)则始终呈现梯度变化。相比之下,在男性中,身体和不适症状以及行人道路交通事故(RTA)都有平等化的证据。在女性中,平等化仅限于特定身体症状、行人RTA、运动损伤和烧伤/烫伤,而不适症状在11岁时的反向梯度随年龄增长而增强。这些模式通常不受所使用的社会经济指标的影响。我们得出结论,虽然一些证据与平等化假设一致,但需要进一步扩展以适应儿童期不存在社会经济差异的模式,特别是反向梯度。这些模式可能反映了青年文化日益普遍的影响,这表明在英国,儿童期和青少年期的界限应设定得更早。这反过来表明,国际比较对于确定平等化发生和未发生的条件具有相当大的分析潜力。