Fluhr Janene D, Oman Roy F, Allen James R, Lanphier Marilyn G, McLeroy Kenneth R
College of Public Health at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in Oklahoma City, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):127-37. doi: 10.1177/1524839903257687.
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate a model for collaboration between program providers and program evaluators. The article describes how university-based evaluators, a state health department, and local program providers collaborated to evaluate 12 projects implementing commercially developed teenage pregnancy prevention (TPP) programs in school settings. Approximately 2,200 students participate annually in the programs. Program evaluation staff and local program providers worked together to construct logic models that helped guide the intervention and evaluation design. The local providers also participated in training sessions, conducted by the evaluation team, to increase their understanding and skills related to program evaluation methods. Student-level outcomes related to knowledge, attitudes, skills, behaviors, as well as an assessment of curricula fidelity were included in the evaluation. The result of this collaborative model has been a quality program evaluation for the projects while maintaining community input regarding program improvements that reflect local population needs.
本文的目的是展示一个项目提供者与项目评估者之间的合作模式。本文描述了大学评估者、州卫生部门和当地项目提供者如何合作，对12个在学校环境中实施商业开发的青少年怀孕预防（TPP）项目进行评估。每年约有2200名学生参与这些项目。项目评估人员和当地项目提供者共同构建逻辑模型，以帮助指导干预措施和评估设计。当地提供者还参加了由评估团队举办的培训课程，以增强他们对项目评估方法的理解和技能。评估包括与知识、态度、技能、行为相关的学生层面的成果，以及对课程保真度的评估。这种合作模式的结果是对这些项目进行了高质量的项目评估，同时保持了社区对反映当地人群需求的项目改进的投入。
