• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对话框:一种用于协作过程评估的工具。

Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.

作者信息

Roe Kathleen, Roe Kevin

机构信息

Health Science Department, San Jose State University, San Jose, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):138-50. doi: 10.1177/1524839903260141.

DOI:10.1177/1524839903260141
PMID:15090168
Abstract

Process evaluation is now a core component of health promotion program evaluations. Over the past decade, considerable attention and resources were devoted to developing sensitive and collaborative process evaluation methodologies. These efforts share the broad commitments that process evaluation should (a) support program goals and objectives, (b) lead to program improvement, and (c) whenever possible, develop evaluation capacity among participants. This article describes dialogue boxes, a process evaluation tool that has proven extremely useful in diverse health promotion program and planning efforts. The tool itself is described, along with eight lessons learned about the power of this seemingly simple evaluation method, comments about the challenges of this type of process evaluation, and tips for using dialogue boxes in health promotion planning and programs.

摘要

过程评估如今是健康促进项目评估的核心组成部分。在过去十年里,人们投入了大量的关注和资源来开发灵敏且具协作性的过程评估方法。这些努力都秉持着广泛的共识,即过程评估应(a)支持项目的目标,(b)促使项目改进,以及(c)尽可能地提升参与者的评估能力。本文介绍了对话框这一过程评估工具,该工具在各类健康促进项目及规划工作中已证明极为有用。文中不仅描述了该工具本身,还阐述了从这种看似简单的评估方法的作用中吸取的八点经验教训、有关此类过程评估所面临挑战的评论,以及在健康促进规划和项目中使用对话框的技巧。

相似文献

1
Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.对话框:一种用于协作过程评估的工具。
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):138-50. doi: 10.1177/1524839903260141.
2
Empowering programs with evaluation technical assistance: outcomes and lessons learned.通过评估技术援助增强项目能力:成果与经验教训
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Jan;10(1 Suppl):38S-44S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908316517.
3
Building partnerships with the community: lessons from the Camden Health Improvement Learning Collaborative.与社区建立伙伴关系:来自卡姆登健康改善学习协作组织的经验教训
J Healthc Manag. 2000 May-Jun;45(3):189-205.
4
Assessing local capacity for health intervention.评估当地的健康干预能力。
Eval Program Plann. 2008 May;31(2):145-59. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
5
The program success story: a valuable tool for program evaluation.项目成功案例:项目评估的宝贵工具。
Health Promot Pract. 2007 Oct;8(4):323-31. doi: 10.1177/1524839907306408. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
6
Development of a planning and evaluation methodology for assessing the contribution of theory to a diabetes prevention lifestyle intervention.开发一种规划和评估方法,以评估理论对糖尿病预防生活方式干预的贡献。
Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4):404-14. doi: 10.1177/1524839906289076. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
7
Partnership lessons from the Global Programme for Health Promotion Effectiveness: a case study.全球健康促进有效性计划的伙伴关系经验教训:一项案例研究
Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):365-71. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan029. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
8
How do we know if we are making a difference with our program or community initiative?我们如何知道我们的项目或社区倡议是否正在产生影响?
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Oct;4(4):367-70. doi: 10.1177/1524839903255769.
9
Evaluation of quality-of-life initiatives in health promotion.健康促进中生活质量倡议的评估
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 2001(92):123-47.
10
Developing a cross-site evaluation tool for diverse health interventions.为多种健康干预措施开发一种跨站点评估工具。
Health Promot Pract. 2010 Jul;11(4):555-61. doi: 10.1177/1524839908324784. Epub 2008 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
What do we want to get out of this? a critical interpretive synthesis of the value of process evaluations, with a practical planning framework.我们想从中学到什么?对过程评估价值的批判性综合分析,以及一个实用的规划框架。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01767-7.