Howard Donna E, Lothen-Kline Christine, Boekeloo Bradley O
Department of Public and Community Health at the University of Maryland in College Park, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):151-9. doi: 10.1177/1524839903258223.
This article uses the case-study methodology as a strategy to facilitate examination of ethical principles that underlie developmental risk research carried out among adolescents. Description of the ethical dilemmas that arose during the implementation of a longitudinal randomized controlled trial is presented along with discussion guidelines. As youth were being enrolled and the trial was being conducted, it was noted that a small but significant number had responded "yes" to a question on suicidal ideation. After review by the Institutional Review Boards overseeing the trial, it was decided that confidentiality had to be breached. A revised protocol was implemented explicitly stating that confidentiality would be broken if a youth reported suicidal ideation. The number of youth reporting suicidal ideation after the consent form was amended decreased significantly. Presentation of this research by use of the case study method sensitizes students to issues that arise at the intersection of disease prevention and health promotion intervention research.
本文采用案例研究方法,作为一种策略来促进对青少年发育风险研究背后的伦理原则的审视。文中介绍了在一项纵向随机对照试验实施过程中出现的伦理困境,并给出了讨论指南。在招募青少年并开展试验的过程中,注意到有一小部分但数量可观的青少年对关于自杀意念的问题回答为“是”。在负责监督试验的机构审查委员会进行审查后,决定必须打破保密原则。实施了一份修订后的方案,明确规定如果青少年报告有自杀意念,将打破保密原则。在同意书修改后,报告有自杀意念的青少年数量显著减少。通过案例研究方法呈现这项研究,能让学生对疾病预防与健康促进干预研究交叉领域出现的问题保持敏感。