Aron Adam R, Monsell Stephen, Sahakian Barbara J, Robbins Trevor W
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
Brain. 2004 Jul;127(Pt 7):1561-73. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh169. Epub 2004 Apr 16.
Executive functions such as task-set switching are thought to depend on the frontal cortex. However, more precision is required in identifying which components of such high-level processes relate to which, if any, subregions of the brain. In a recent study of 19 patients with focal right frontal (RF) lesions and 17 with left frontal (LF) lesions, we found that response inhibition, as measured by the stop-signal task, was specifically disrupted by damage to the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). The present study examined task-switching performance in this same group of patients and in matched controls on the grounds that inhibitory mechanisms may also be required to switch task-set. Both RF and LF patients showed significantly larger switch costs (the difference, in reaction time and errors, between changing tasks and repeating the same task) than controls, but apparently for different reasons. For RF patients, a part of the switch deficit could be accounted for by impaired inhibition of inappropriate responses or task-sets triggered by stimuli, and one measure of the switch cost correlated reliably with damage to the IFG, specifically the pars opercularis (POp). For LF patients, a part of the switch deficit may have arisen from weak top-down control of task-set. The degree of top-down control correlated reliably with the extent of damage to the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG). This study localizes two components of the complex task-switching process (inhibition of task-sets and/or responses and top-down control of task-set) to the right IFG/POp and the left MFG respectively.
诸如任务集切换等执行功能被认为依赖于额叶皮质。然而,在确定这种高级过程的哪些组成部分与大脑的哪些(如果有的话)亚区域相关时,需要更高的精确性。在最近一项针对19名右侧额叶局灶性(RF)病变患者和17名左侧额叶(LF)病变患者的研究中,我们发现,通过停止信号任务测量的反应抑制,会因右侧额下回(IFG)受损而受到特异性破坏。本研究基于切换任务集可能也需要抑制机制这一理由,对同一组患者和匹配的对照组的任务切换表现进行了检查。RF和LF患者的切换成本(改变任务与重复相同任务之间在反应时间和错误方面的差异)均显著高于对照组,但原因显然不同。对于RF患者,部分切换缺陷可归因于对由刺激触发的不适当反应或任务集的抑制受损,并且一种切换成本测量与IFG损伤,特别是岛盖部(POp)损伤可靠相关。对于LF患者,部分切换缺陷可能源于对任务集的自上而下控制不足。自上而下控制的程度与左侧额中回(MFG)损伤程度可靠相关。本研究分别将复杂任务切换过程的两个组成部分(任务集和/或反应的抑制以及任务集的自上而下控制)定位到右侧IFG/POp和左侧MFG。