Golański Jacek, Nocuń Marek, Rózalski Marcin, Drygas Wojciech, Watała Cezary
Department of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2004 Mar;15(2):187-95. doi: 10.1097/00001721-200403000-00011.
A discovery of 'aspirin resistance' has prompted the search for fast and reliable methods for the monitoring of antiplatelet efficacy of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Our aims were: (1) to evaluate the in vitro model-based method for detecting a reduced platelets' sensitivity to ASA using a point-of-care platelet function analyser PFA-100; and (2) to propose a simple method of data analysis that might be successfully employed to discriminate between 'good' and 'poor' responders to aspirin. Whole blood platelets from healthy volunteers were incubated in vitro with 30 microg/ml ASA (the in vitro method under evaluation) or analysed following a 10-day intake of an average 150 mg ASA (Aspirin Protect) daily (the reference ex vivo method). According to polynomial regression analysis of the bimodally distributed data, the donors with lower ('ASA poor responders') or higher platelet sensitivity to ASA ('ASA good responders') were discriminated at 58.6% of platelet function inhibition. Despite the similar proportions of 'ASA poor responders' (44 versus 41% using the ex vivo and in vitro tests, respectively), 30% of discordant classifications point to a rather unsatisfactory convergence between both methods. Due to a considerable discordance between the in vitro and ex vivo tests of ASA efficacy performed with the use of the PFA-100 system, the former cannot be reliably and interchangeably used for the monitoring of aspirin therapy and the selection of an effective therapeutic ASA dose. A novel approach to data analysis of the distribution of platelet inhibition rates facilitates an evaluation of cut-off points required to discriminate between 'poor responders' and 'good responders' to aspirin.
“阿司匹林抵抗”的发现促使人们寻找快速可靠的方法来监测乙酰水杨酸(ASA)的抗血小板疗效。我们的目的是:(1)使用即时检验血小板功能分析仪PFA - 100评估基于体外模型的方法,以检测血小板对ASA敏感性降低的情况;(2)提出一种简单的数据分析方法,该方法可能成功用于区分阿司匹林的“良好”和“不良”反应者。来自健康志愿者的全血血小板在体外与30微克/毫升ASA孵育(正在评估的体外方法),或在平均每天摄入150毫克ASA(阿司匹林保护片)10天后进行分析(参考离体方法)。根据对双峰分布数据的多项式回归分析,在血小板功能抑制率为58.6%时,可区分出对ASA敏感性较低的供体(“ASA不良反应者”)或较高的供体(“ASA良好反应者”)。尽管“ASA不良反应者”的比例相似(分别使用离体和体外试验时为44%和41%),但30%的不一致分类表明两种方法之间的一致性相当不理想。由于使用PFA - 100系统进行的ASA疗效体外和离体试验之间存在相当大的差异,前者不能可靠且可互换地用于监测阿司匹林治疗和选择有效的治疗性ASA剂量。一种分析血小板抑制率分布的新方法有助于评估区分阿司匹林“不良反应者”和“良好反应者”所需的临界点。