Jeong Yeon Joo, Lee Kyung Soo, Yoon Young Cheol, Kim Tae Sung, Chung Myung Jin, Kim Seonwoo
Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Mar-Apr;28(2):195-203. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200403000-00008.
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal slab thickness for condensing transaxial images into maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the evaluation of small pulmonary arteries using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT).
Helical computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained from lung apices to bases using 16-slice MDCT [120 kV(peak), 180 mA, beam width of 10 mm, beam pitch of 1.375, and reconstruction thickness of 1.25 mm] in 29 patients suspected of having a pulmonary embolism. Four kinds of image series (1.25-mm thick original transaxial source images and 3 kinds of reconstructed images using the MIP technique with slab thicknesses of 2.5 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm) were obtained from each patient and forwarded to monitors of a picture archiving and communication system for analysis by 2 independent observers. The observers recorded the name of the segmental (20 total; 10 in each lung) and subsegmental (40 total; 20 in each lung) arteries that were traceable in each image series. Image quality of the 4 image types were graded into 5 scales based on their degree of vascular opacification, the sharpness of the vascular margins of the contrast-enhanced CT angiograms, and the visibility of lung parenchyma (excellent [5] to nondiagnostic [1]) and compared.
In both the 1.25-mm thick original transaxial and 2.5-mm thick MIP images, a higher percentage of subsegmental arteries was traceable (91.3% [2119/2320 observations] and 87.2% [2023/2320 observations], respectively; P <0.05) than in the 5-mm and 10-mm thick MIP images (66.4% [1540/2320] and 40.5% [940/2320], respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed between the 1.25-mm thick transaxial and 2.5-mm thick MIP images in this respect. Image quality of 2.5-mm thick MIP images was superior to that of the 5-mm and 10-mm thick MIP images (P < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found between the scores of the image quality of the 1.25-mm thick original transaxial images and the 2.5-mm thick MIP images.
After reducing the image number by one half, 2.5-mm thick MIP images using 16-slice MDCT are found to provide satisfactory images, which are comparable to 1.25-mm thick transaxial images for the analysis of subsegmental pulmonary arteries in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism.
本研究旨在确定在使用16层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)评估小肺动脉时,将横断面图像浓缩为最大密度投影(MIP)图像的最佳层厚。
对29例疑似肺栓塞患者,使用16层MDCT[120 kV(峰值),180 mA,束宽10 mm,螺距1.375,重建层厚1.25 mm]从肺尖至肺底进行螺旋CT扫描。从每位患者获取四种图像系列(1.25 mm厚的原始横断面源图像以及使用MIP技术、层厚分别为2.5 mm、5 mm和10 mm的三种重建图像),并转发至图像存档与通信系统的监视器,由两名独立观察者进行分析。观察者记录每个图像系列中可追踪的肺段动脉(共20个;每侧肺10个)和亚段动脉(共40个;每侧肺20个)的名称。根据血管强化程度、对比增强CT血管造影的血管边缘清晰度以及肺实质的可见度,将这四种图像类型的图像质量分为5个等级(优秀[5]至无法诊断[1])并进行比较。
在1.25 mm厚的原始横断面图像和2.5 mm厚的MIP图像中,可追踪的亚段动脉百分比更高(分别为91.3%[2119/2320次观察]和87.2%[2023/2320次观察];P<0.05),高于5 mm和10 mm厚的MIP图像(分别为66.4%[1540/2320]和40.5%[940/2320])。在这方面,1.25 mm厚的横断面图像和2.5 mm厚的MIP图像之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。2.5 mm厚的MIP图像的图像质量优于厚度为5 mm和10 mm的MIP图像(P<0.0001)。1.25 mm厚的原始横断面图像和2.5 mm厚的MIP图像的图像质量评分之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。
在将图像数量减少一半后,发现使用16层MDCT的2.5 mm厚MIP图像可提供令人满意的图像,在分析疑似肺栓塞患者的亚段肺动脉方面,与1.25 mm厚的横断面图像相当。