Phibbs Ciaran S, Bhandari Aman, Yu Wei, Barnett Paul G
VA HSR&D Health Economics Resource Center, VA Cooperative Studies Program, Department of Health Research and Policy, Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Sep;60(3 Suppl):54S-73S. doi: 10.1177/1077558703256725.
This article reports how we matched Common Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes with Medicare payment rates and aggregate Veterans Affairs (VA) budget data to estimate the costs of every VA ambulatory encounter. Converting CPT codes to encounter-level costs was more complex than a simple match of Medicare reimbursements to CPT codes. About 40 percent of the CPT codes used in VA, representing about 20 percent of procedures, did not have a Medicare payment rate and required other cost estimates. Reconciling aggregated estimated costs to the VA budget allocations for outpatient care produced final VA cost estimates that were lower than projected Medicare reimbursements. The methods used to estimate costs for encounters could be replicated for other settings. They are potentially useful for any system that does not generate billing data, when CPT codes are simpler to collect than billing data, or when there is a need to standardize cost estimates across data sources.
本文报告了我们如何将通用程序术语(CPT)代码与医疗保险支付率以及退伍军人事务部(VA)的总预算数据相匹配,以估算VA门诊每次就诊的费用。将CPT代码转换为就诊级成本比简单地将医疗保险报销与CPT代码匹配更为复杂。VA使用的CPT代码中约40%(代表约20%的程序)没有医疗保险支付率,需要其他成本估算。将汇总的估计成本与VA门诊护理预算分配进行核对后得出的最终VA成本估计低于预计的医疗保险报销。用于估算就诊成本的方法可在其他环境中复制。当CPT代码比计费数据更易于收集时,或者当需要跨数据源标准化成本估算时,这些方法对于任何不生成计费数据的系统可能都很有用。