• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国年轻退伍军人慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的补充和综合健康方法的使用:一项经济评估。

The use of complementary and integrative health approaches for chronic musculoskeletal pain in younger US Veterans: An economic evaluation.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.

Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 5;14(6):e0217831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217831. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0217831
PMID:31167005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6550429/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the cost-effectiveness to the US Veterans Health Administration (VA) of the use of complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches by younger Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) pain.

PERSPECTIVE

VA healthcare system.

METHODS

We used a propensity score-adjusted hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), and 2010-2013 VA administrative data to estimate differences in VA healthcare costs, pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale), and opioid use between CIH users and nonusers. We identified CIH use in Veterans' medical records through Current Procedural Terminology, VA workload tracking, and provider-type codes.

RESULTS

We identified 30,634 younger Veterans with chronic MSD pain as using CIH and 195,424 with no CIH use. CIH users differed from nonusers across all baseline covariates except the Charlson comorbidity index. They also differed on annual pre-CIH-start healthcare costs ($10,729 versus $5,818), pain (4.33 versus 3.76), and opioid use (66.6% versus 54.0%). The HLM results indicated lower annual healthcare costs (-$637; 95% CI: -$1,023, -$247), lower pain (-0.34; -0.40, -0.27), and slightly higher (less than a percentage point) opioid use (0.8; 0.6, 0.9) for CIH users in the year after CIH start. Sensitivity analyses indicated similar results for three most-used CIH approaches (acupuncture, chiropractic care, and massage), but higher costs for those with eight or more CIH visits.

CONCLUSIONS

On average CIH use appears associated with lower healthcare costs and pain and slightly higher opioid use in this population of younger Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Given the VA's growing interest in the use of CIH, further, more detailed analyses of its impacts are warranted.

摘要

目的

评估美国退伍军人事务部(VA)采用补充和整合健康(CIH)方法治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)疼痛的年轻退伍军人的成本效益。

观点

VA 医疗保健系统。

方法

我们使用倾向评分调整的分层线性模型(HLM)和 2010-2013 年 VA 管理数据,来估计 CIH 用户和非用户之间 VA 医疗保健成本、疼痛强度(0-10 数字评分量表)和阿片类药物使用的差异。我们通过当前程序术语、VA 工作量跟踪和提供者类型代码在退伍军人的医疗记录中确定 CIH 的使用。

结果

我们确定了 30634 名患有慢性 MSD 疼痛的年轻退伍军人使用 CIH,195424 名退伍军人未使用 CIH。CIH 用户与非用户在所有基线协变量上存在差异,除了 Charlson 合并症指数。他们在年度预 CIH 启动医疗保健费用($10729 与 $5818)、疼痛(4.33 与 3.76)和阿片类药物使用(66.6% 与 54.0%)方面也存在差异。HLM 结果表明,CIH 用户在 CIH 启动后的第一年,年度医疗保健成本降低了(-$637;95%CI:-$1023,-$247),疼痛减轻了(-0.34;-0.40,-0.27),阿片类药物使用略有增加(不到一个百分点)(0.8;0.6,0.9)。敏感性分析表明,三种最常用的 CIH 方法(针灸、整脊疗法和按摩)的结果类似,但对于接受 8 次或更多 CIH 治疗的患者,成本更高。

结论

在患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的年轻退伍军人中,CIH 的使用平均来看与较低的医疗保健成本和疼痛以及略高的阿片类药物使用相关。鉴于 VA 对 CIH 使用的兴趣不断增加,有必要对其影响进行进一步、更详细的分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a1/6550429/72f6eca33618/pone.0217831.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a1/6550429/72f6eca33618/pone.0217831.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a1/6550429/72f6eca33618/pone.0217831.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of complementary and integrative health approaches for chronic musculoskeletal pain in younger US Veterans: An economic evaluation.美国年轻退伍军人慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的补充和综合健康方法的使用:一项经济评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 5;14(6):e0217831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217831. eCollection 2019.
2
Use of Complementary and Integrated Health: A Retrospective Analysis of U.S. Veterans with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Nationally.补充与整合健康的使用:对美国全国慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛退伍军人的回顾性分析。
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):32-39. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0276. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
3
We Built it, But Did They Come: Veterans' Use of VA Healthcare System-Provided Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches.我们建立了它,但他们来了吗:退伍军人使用退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统提供的补充和综合健康方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):905-912. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07889-4. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
4
Evaluation of Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches Among US Veterans with Musculoskeletal Pain Using Propensity Score Methods.采用倾向评分方法评估美国肌肉骨骼疼痛退伍军人的补充和综合健康方法。
Pain Med. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):90-102. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny027.
5
Utilization of complementary and integrative health services and opioid therapy by patients receiving Veterans Health Administration pain care.接受退伍军人事务部疼痛护理的患者对补充和综合健康服务以及阿片类药物治疗的利用。
Complement Ther Med. 2018 Aug;39:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Complementary, Integrative, and Nondrug Therapy Use for Pain Among US Military Veterans on Long-term Opioids.美国长期使用阿片类药物的退伍军人中补充、综合、非药物治疗疼痛的使用情况。
Med Care. 2020 Sep;58 Suppl 2 9S(Suppl 2 9 Suppl):S116-S124. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001333.
7
Gender Differences in Use of Complementary and Integrative Health by U.S. Military Veterans with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.美国慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛退伍军人对补充和整合健康的使用存在性别差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Sep-Oct;28(5):379-386. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
8
Changes in Use of Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies at the Veterans Affairs: Findings from a Whole Health System Pilot Program.退伍军人事务部补充与综合健康疗法使用情况的变化:一项全健康系统试点项目的结果
J Integr Complement Med. 2023 Dec;29(12):805-812. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0816. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
Perceptions of other integrative health therapies by Veterans with pain who are receiving massage.接受按摩治疗的疼痛退伍军人对其他综合健康疗法的看法。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(1):117-26. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.01.0015.
10
Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches and Pain Care Quality in the Veterans Health Administration Primary Care Setting: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.补充和综合健康方法与退伍军人健康管理局初级保健环境中的疼痛护理质量:一项准实验分析。
J Integr Complement Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;29(6-7):420-429. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0686. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Complementary and integrative medicine - Resolving situations of reduced remuneration for additional work under the SwissDRG system.补充与整合医学——解决瑞士诊断相关分组(SwissDRG)系统下额外工作报酬降低的情况。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 25;10(15):e34732. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34732. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
2
The Problem of Pain in Rheumatology: Variations in Case Definitions Derived From Chronic Pain Phenotyping Algorithms Using Electronic Health Records.风湿学中的疼痛问题:基于电子健康记录的慢性疼痛表型算法的病例定义变化。
J Rheumatol. 2024 Mar 1;51(3):297-304. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0416.
3
Real-world data and evidence in pain research: a qualitative systematic review of methods in current practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Complementary and Integrated Health Approaches: What Do Veterans Use and Want.补充和整合健康方法:退伍军人的使用和需求。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1192-1199. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04862-6. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Manipulation and Mobilization for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for an Appropriateness Panel.手法治疗和关节松动术治疗慢性非特异性颈痛:适宜性评价小组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):E55-E70.
3
Acupuncture 'dose' (number of treatments) and insurance benefits in the USA.
疼痛研究中的真实世界数据与证据:对当前实践中方法的定性系统评价
Pain Rep. 2023 Feb 1;8(2):e1057. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001057. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
4
Complementary/integrative healthcare utilization in US Gulf-War era veterans: Descriptive analyses based on deployment history, combat exposure, and Gulf War Illness.美国海湾战争时期退伍军人对补充/整合医疗保健的利用:基于部署历史、战斗暴露和海湾战争疾病的描述性分析。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;49:101644. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101644. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
5
Integrating Massage Therapy Into the Health Care of Female Veterans.将按摩疗法融入女性退伍军人的医疗保健中。
Fed Pract. 2022 Feb;39(2):86-92. doi: 10.12788/fp.0223. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
6
From patient outcomes to system change: Evaluating the impact of VHA's implementation of the Whole Health System of Care.从患者治疗效果到系统变革:评估退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)实施全健康照护系统的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13938. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
7
Non-pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain in US Veterans Treated Within the Veterans Health Administration: Implications for Expansion in US Healthcare Systems.美国退伍军人事务部治疗的慢性疼痛的非药物治疗:对美国医疗保健系统扩张的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3937-3946. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07370-8. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Care Outcomes for Chiropractic Outpatient Veterans (COCOV): a qualitative study with veteran stakeholders from a pilot trial of multimodal chiropractic care.脊椎按摩疗法门诊退伍军人护理结果(COCOV):一项针对多模式脊椎按摩疗法试点试验中退伍军人利益相关者的定性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 14;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00962-5.
9
Initial Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Responses from Brief Interviews of Primary Care Providers.急性和慢性下背痛的初始管理:初级保健提供者简要访谈的回应。
J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(S1):S106-S114. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0391.
10
Exploring the application of the Charlson Comorbidity Index to assess the patient population seen in a Veterans Affairs chiropractic residency program.探索查尔森合并症指数在评估退伍军人事务部脊椎按摩疗法住院医师培训项目中所见患者群体方面的应用。
J Chiropr Educ. 2021 Oct 1;35(2):199-204. doi: 10.7899/JCE-20-1.
针刺“剂量”(治疗次数)与美国的保险福利。
Acupunct Med. 2018 Apr;36(2):88-95. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2016-011341. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Decline in Prescription Opioids Attributable to Decreases in Long-Term Use: A Retrospective Study in the Veterans Health Administration 2010-2016.2010-2016 年退伍军人健康管理局的回顾性研究:处方阿片类药物减少与长期使用减少有关。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):818-824. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4283-8. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手法治疗和关节松动术治疗慢性下腰痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2018 May;18(5):866-879. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.非药物治疗腰痛:美国医师学院临床实践指南的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians.非侵入性治疗急性、亚急性和慢性下背痛:美国医师学院临床实践指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
8
Mindfulness Meditation for Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.正念冥想治疗慢性疼痛:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Apr;51(2):199-213. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9844-2.
9
The Impact of Massage Therapy on Function in Pain Populations-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Part I, Patients Experiencing Pain in the General Population.按摩疗法对疼痛人群功能的影响——随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析:第一部分,普通人群中的疼痛患者
Pain Med. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):1353-1375. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw099.
10
The Impact of Massage Therapy on Function in Pain Populations-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Part II, Cancer Pain Populations.按摩疗法对疼痛人群功能的影响——随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析:第二部分,癌症疼痛人群
Pain Med. 2016 Aug;17(8):1553-1568. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw100. Epub 2016 May 10.