• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重印订单的数量有多重要?

How important is the size of a reprint order?

作者信息

Hopewell Sally, Clarke Mike

机构信息

The UK Cochrane Centre, Middle Way, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Fall;19(4):711-4. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000680.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462303000680
PMID:15095778
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the impact of articles with very high reprint orders ("high-reprint articles") by measuring their citation in the subsequent literature as compared with a control group of articles.

METHODS

The twenty-one articles (published in the Lancet in 1998) with reprint orders of over 10,000 were matched with a control set of twenty-one articles with smaller reprint orders. The Science Citation Index was used to obtain the number of citations for each of the forty-two articles.

RESULTS

The twenty-one high-reprint articles were cited 2,548 times; the mean number of citations was 121 (range, 3 to 499 citations per article). Five of the twenty-one high-reprint articles had more than 200 citations, but seven (33%) were cited twenty-five times or fewer. The twenty-one control articles were cited 986 times; the mean number of citations was forty-seven (range, 1 to 165). Fifteen (71%) of the twenty-one control articles were cited twenty-five times or fewer. Thirteen of the high-reprint articles were reports of randomized trials with a mean of 163 citations. In the control articles, six were reports of randomized trials with a mean of eighty-eight citations.

CONCLUSIONS

Articles with a high-reprint order were cited more frequently than other articles. However, some high-reprint articles were cited infrequently. If the size of a reprint order is related to the importance of an article, those articles with very high reprint orders may, therefore, be perceived as more important. Further research is needed to explore other aspects of the relative importance and impact of high-reprint articles.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过测量“高重印量文章”(即重印订单量非常高的文章)在后续文献中的引用情况,并与对照组文章进行比较,以评估其影响。

方法

将21篇(1998年发表于《柳叶刀》)重印订单量超过10000份的文章与21篇重印订单量较小的对照组文章进行匹配。使用科学引文索引获取这42篇文章各自的引用次数。

结果

21篇高重印量文章被引用2548次;平均引用次数为121次(范围为每篇文章3至499次引用)。21篇高重印量文章中有5篇引用次数超过200次,但有7篇(33%)被引用25次或更少。21篇对照文章被引用986次;平均引用次数为47次(范围为1至165次)。21篇对照文章中有15篇(71%)被引用25次或更少。13篇高重印量文章是随机试验报告,平均引用次数为163次。在对照文章中,有6篇是随机试验报告,平均引用次数为88次。

结论

高重印订单量的文章比其他文章被引用得更频繁。然而,一些高重印量文章被引用得很少。如果重印订单量的大小与文章的重要性相关,那么那些重印订单量非常高的文章可能会被认为更重要。需要进一步研究来探索高重印量文章相对重要性和影响的其他方面。

相似文献

1
How important is the size of a reprint order?重印订单的数量有多重要?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Fall;19(4):711-4. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000680.
2
High reprint orders in medical journals and pharmaceutical industry funding: case-control study.医学期刊高转载量与制药业资助:病例对照研究。
BMJ. 2012 Jun 28;344:e4212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4212.
3
The 100 Most-Cited Articles in Visceral Surgery: A Systematic Review.内脏外科领域被引用次数最多的100篇文章:一项系统综述。
Dig Surg. 2016;33(6):509-19. doi: 10.1159/000446930. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
The Most Frequently Cited 100 Articles in Liver Transplantation Literature.肝移植文献中被引用次数最多的100篇文章。
Transplant Proc. 2017 Apr;49(3):551-561. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.042.
5
Distribution of Citations Received by Scientific Papers Published in the Imaging Literature From 2001 to 2010: Decreasing Inequality and Polarization.2001 年至 2010 年发表在影像学文献中的科学论文被引频次的分布:不平等和极化程度的降低。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):248-254. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17769.
6
Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals.期刊声望、发表偏倚以及与同行评审期刊中已发表研究被引用相关的其他特征。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2847-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2847.
7
Bibliometric analysis of 100 most cited articles on oral submucous fibrosis.100 篇口腔黏膜下纤维性变高引论文的文献计量学分析。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 Sep;47(8):781-787. doi: 10.1111/jop.12742. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
The 100 Most-Cited Reports About Craniopharyngioma.关于颅咽管瘤被引用次数最多的100份报告。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e910-e921. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
9
[An analysis of articles published by academic groups in pediatrics in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics and their citations].《中华儿科杂志》发表的儿科学术团体文章及其被引情况分析
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;52(8):630-3.
10
Citation classics in radiology journals: the 100 top-cited articles, 1945-2012.放射学期刊中的引文经典:1945-2012 年的 100 篇高被引文章。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):471-81. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10489.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the Factors Affecting Papers' Citability in the Field of Medicine: an Evidence-based Approach Using 200 Highly and Lowly-cited Papers.识别影响医学领域论文可引用性的因素:基于证据的方法,使用200篇高被引和低被引论文
Acta Inform Med. 2018;26(1):10-14. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.10-14.
2
Number of citations 1 year after publication of trial results and their relation to medicines regulatory approval.试验结果发表1年后的引用次数及其与药品监管批准的关系。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;81(4):786-8. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12832. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
3
Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals.
编辑和同行评审过程在发表偏倚中的作用:对提交给八家医学期刊的药物试验的分析
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104846. eCollection 2014.
4
High reprint orders in medical journals and pharmaceutical industry funding: case-control study.医学期刊高转载量与制药业资助:病例对照研究。
BMJ. 2012 Jun 28;344:e4212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4212.
5
Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.医学期刊的利益冲突:行业支持的随机试验对期刊影响因子和收入的影响 - 队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2010 Oct 26;7(10):e1000354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000354.
6
Publishing clinical trial results: the future beckons.发布临床试验结果:未来可期。
PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 Oct 27;1(6):e31. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010031.