Dossenbach Martin, Erol Almila, el Mahfoud Kessaci Mohand, Shaheen Mostafa O, Sunbol Mohammed M, Boland Jason, Hodge Andrew, O'Halloran Ruth A, Bitter Istvan
Eli Lilly Ges.m.b.H., Barichgasse 40-52, Vienna 1030, Austria.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;65(3):312-21.
The Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study was designed to provide information regarding use and outcome of antipsychotic treatments in a large, diverse population in real practice settings.
Outpatients with schizophrenia (ICD-10 or DSM-IV) who initiated or changed to a new antipsychotic entered this 3-year, naturalistic, prospective observational study. Four monotherapy treatment groups were defined according to the antipsychotic prescribed at baseline, namely olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and haloperidol. Efficacy was assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness rating scale (CGI-S), inclusive of subscales for positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms. Tolerability was assessed by adverse event questionnaires and weight measurements. Six-month findings are described.
At baseline, 5833 participants were prescribed monotherapy and the mean severity of illness was moderate to marked (CGI-S). At 6 months, olanzapine resulted in significantly greater improvements in overall, positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms compared with quetiapine, risperidone or haloperidol (p <.001). Improvements in overall, negative, and cognitive symptoms were significantly higher for risperidone compared with haloperidol (p <.001), whereas improvements across all symptoms were comparable for quetiapine and haloperidol. Extra-pyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia decreased compared with baseline in the olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone groups but increased in the haloperidol group (p <.001, likelihood of extrapyramidal symptoms with haloperidol compared with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone). Sexual function adverse events were most prominent in the haloperidol and risperidone treatment groups. Weight change was significantly greater for olanzapine compared with the other antipsychotics (p <.001).
Our results support the previously reported positive impact of atypical antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine, in patients with schizophrenia.
洲际精神分裂症门诊健康结局(IC - SOHO)研究旨在提供关于在实际临床环境中,大量不同人群使用抗精神病药物治疗的情况及结局的信息。
开始使用或换用新抗精神病药物的精神分裂症门诊患者(依据国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)或精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM - IV))进入这项为期3年的自然前瞻性观察性研究。根据基线时所开的抗精神病药物定义了四个单药治疗组,即奥氮平、利培酮、喹硫平和氟哌啶醇。使用临床总体印象 - 疾病严重程度评定量表(CGI - S)评估疗效,该量表包括阳性、阴性、抑郁和认知症状的子量表。通过不良事件问卷和体重测量评估耐受性。描述了6个月的研究结果。
基线时,5833名参与者接受单药治疗,疾病严重程度平均为中度至重度(CGI - S)。6个月时,与喹硫平、利培酮或氟哌啶醇相比,奥氮平在总体、阳性、阴性、抑郁和认知症状方面的改善显著更大(p <.001)。与氟哌啶醇相比,利培酮在总体、阴性和认知症状方面的改善显著更高(p <.001),而喹硫平和氟哌啶醇在所有症状方面的改善相当。与基线相比,奥氮平、喹硫平和利培酮组的锥体外系症状和迟发性运动障碍减少,而氟哌啶醇组增加(p <.001,与奥氮平、喹硫平或利培酮相比,氟哌啶醇出现锥体外系症状的可能性)。性功能不良事件在氟哌啶醇和利培酮治疗组中最为突出。与其他抗精神病药物相比,奥氮平的体重变化显著更大(p <.001)。
我们的结果支持先前报道的非典型抗精神病药物,特别是奥氮平,对精神分裂症患者的积极影响。