• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项对两项为期18个月的安慰剂对照试验进行的汇总分析,这两项试验涉及拉莫三嗪和锂盐用于双相I型障碍的维持治疗。

A pooled analysis of 2 placebo-controlled 18-month trials of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance in bipolar I disorder.

作者信息

Goodwin Guy M, Bowden Charles L, Calabrese Joseph R, Grunze Heinz, Kasper Siegfried, White Robin, Greene Paul, Leadbetter Robert

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, England, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;65(3):432-41. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0321.

DOI:10.4088/jcp.v65n0321
PMID:15096085
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two clinical trials, prospectively designed for combined analysis, compared placebo, lithium, and lamotrigine for treatment of bipolar I disorder in recently depressed or manic patients.

METHOD

1315 bipolar I patients (DSM-IV) enrolled in the initial open-label phase, and 638 were stabilized and randomly assigned to 18 months of double-blind monotherapy with lamotrigine (N = 280; 50-400 mg/day fixed dose or 100-400 mg/day flexible dose), lithium (N = 167; serum level of 0.8-1.1 mEq/L), or placebo (N = 191). The primary endpoint was time from randomization to intervention for a mood episode. Data were gathered from August 1997 to August 2001.

RESULTS

Lamotrigine and lithium were superior to placebo for time to intervention for any mood episode (median survival: placebo, 86 days [95% CI = 58 to 121]; lithium, 184 days [95% CI = 119 to not calculable]; lamotrigine, 197 days [95% CI = 144 to 388]). Lamotrigine was superior to placebo for time to intervention for depression (median survival: placebo, 270 days [95% CI = 138 to not calculable]; lithium, median not calculable; lamotrigine, median not calculable). Lithium and lamotrigine were superior to placebo for time to intervention for mania (median survival not calculable for any group). Results of additional analyses adjusted for index mood were similar; however, only lithium was superior to placebo for intervention for mania. There was no evidence that either active treatment caused affective switch. Adverse event analysis indicated more diarrhea (19% vs. 7%, p <.05) and tremor (15% vs. 4%, p <.05) in lithium-treated patients compared with lamotrigine-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamotrigine and lithium stabilized mood by delaying the time to treatment for a mood episode. Lamotrigine was effective against depression and mania, with more robust activity against depression. Lithium was effective against mania.

摘要

背景

两项为联合分析而前瞻性设计的临床试验,比较了安慰剂、锂盐和拉莫三嗪对近期抑郁或躁狂的双相I型障碍患者的治疗效果。

方法

1315例双相I型障碍(DSM-IV)患者进入初始开放标签阶段,其中638例病情稳定并被随机分配接受为期18个月的双盲单一疗法,分别使用拉莫三嗪(N = 280;50 - 400毫克/天固定剂量或100 - 400毫克/天灵活剂量)、锂盐(N = 167;血清水平0.8 - 1.1毫当量/升)或安慰剂(N = 191)。主要终点是从随机分组到出现情绪发作进行干预的时间。数据收集时间为1997年8月至2001年8月。

结果

对于任何情绪发作的干预时间,拉莫三嗪和锂盐均优于安慰剂(中位生存期:安慰剂组86天[95%可信区间 = 58至121];锂盐组184天[95%可信区间 = 119至无法计算];拉莫三嗪组197天[95%可信区间 = 144至388])。对于抑郁发作的干预时间,拉莫三嗪优于安慰剂(中位生存期:安慰剂组270天[95%可信区间 = 138至无法计算];锂盐组中位生存期无法计算;拉莫三嗪组中位生存期无法计算)。对于躁狂发作的干预时间,锂盐和拉莫三嗪均优于安慰剂(任何组的中位生存期均无法计算)。针对起始情绪进行调整后的其他分析结果相似;然而,仅锂盐在干预躁狂方面优于安慰剂。没有证据表明任何一种活性治疗会导致情感转换。不良事件分析表明,与拉莫三嗪治疗的患者相比,锂盐治疗的患者腹泻(19%对7%,p <.05)和震颤(15%对4%,p <.05)更为常见。

结论

拉莫三嗪和锂盐通过延迟情绪发作的治疗时间来稳定情绪。拉莫三嗪对抑郁和躁狂均有效,对抑郁的作用更强。锂盐对躁狂有效。

相似文献

1
A pooled analysis of 2 placebo-controlled 18-month trials of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance in bipolar I disorder.一项对两项为期18个月的安慰剂对照试验进行的汇总分析,这两项试验涉及拉莫三嗪和锂盐用于双相I型障碍的维持治疗。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;65(3):432-41. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0321.
2
A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently depressed patients with bipolar I disorder.一项针对近期患有双相 I 型障碍抑郁症患者的拉莫三嗪和锂盐维持治疗的安慰剂对照18个月试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;64(9):1013-24. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0906.
3
[Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders].[双相情感障碍中的抗精神病药物]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95456-5.
4
Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine as add-on treatment to lithium in bipolar depression: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.拉莫三嗪作为锂盐辅助治疗双相抑郁的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;70(2):223-31. doi: 10.4088/jcp.08m04152. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
5
Lamotrigine: a review of its use in bipolar disorder.拉莫三嗪:用于双相情感障碍的综述。
Drugs. 2003;63(19):2029-50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363190-00009.
6
A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently manic or hypomanic patients with bipolar I disorder.一项针对近期有躁狂或轻躁狂发作的双相I型障碍患者,使用拉莫三嗪和锂盐维持治疗的为期18个月的安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;60(4):392-400. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.4.392.
7
Recurrence in bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis excluding relapses in two double-blind maintenance studies.双相 I 型障碍的复发:一项排除两项双盲维持治疗研究中复发情况的事后分析。
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):1061-4. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.034.
8
Spotlight on lamotrigine in bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍中拉莫三嗪的聚焦
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(1):63-7. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418010-00007.
9
Mood stabilization and destabilization during acute and continuation phase treatment for bipolar I disorder with lamotrigine or placebo.使用拉莫三嗪或安慰剂对双相I型障碍进行急性期和维持期治疗期间的情绪稳定与不稳定情况。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;70(9):1273-80. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04381. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
10
Olanzapine or lamotrigine addition to lithium in remitted bipolar disorder patients with anxiety disorder comorbidity: a randomized, single-blind, pilot study.在缓解期双相情感障碍合并焦虑症患者中,联用奥氮平或拉莫三嗪与锂盐:一项随机、单盲的试点研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):609-16. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0413.

引用本文的文献

1
Bipolar Disorder Among Older Adults: Newer Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice.老年双相情感障碍:指导临床实践的新证据
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2023 Oct;21(4):370-379. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20230010. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
2
Effectiveness of ultra-long-term lithium treatment: relevant factors and case series.超长期锂治疗的有效性:相关因素及病例系列
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2024 Mar 15;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40345-024-00328-9.
3
Mood Stabilizers of First and Second Generation.第一代和第二代心境稳定剂。
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 29;13(5):741. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050741.
4
Cardiac morbidity and mortality associated with the use of lamotrigine.使用拉莫三嗪与心脏发病率和死亡率的关系。
Epilepsia. 2022 Sep;63(9):2371-2380. doi: 10.1111/epi.17339. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Impact of Selected Initial Titration Schedules on Safety and Long-Term Effectiveness of Lamotrigine for the Treatment of Mood Disorders.拉莫三嗪治疗心境障碍的初始滴定方案对安全性和长期疗效的影响。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022;42(4):350-356. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001557. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Acute and Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar Depression.双相抑郁的急性和维持治疗
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Sep 20;58(Suppl 1):S31-S40. doi: 10.29399/npa.27408. eCollection 2021.
7
Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorder across the lifespan: a systematic review.拉莫三嗪在全生命周期双相情感障碍治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2021 Oct 8;11:20451253211045870. doi: 10.1177/20451253211045870. eCollection 2021.
8
Treatment of bipolar disorders in older adults: a review.老年双相情感障碍的治疗:综述
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 21;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12991-021-00367-x.
9
Lamotrigine for acute bipolar depression: An exploratory item-level analysis.拉莫三嗪治疗双相情感障碍急性抑郁发作:一项探索性的项目水平分析。
Brain Behav. 2021 Aug;11(8):e2222. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2222. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
10
Efficacy of Carbamazepine and Its Derivatives in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder.卡马西平及其衍生物治疗双相情感障碍的疗效。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 30;57(5):433. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050433.