Suppr超能文献

一项对两项为期18个月的安慰剂对照试验进行的汇总分析,这两项试验涉及拉莫三嗪和锂盐用于双相I型障碍的维持治疗。

A pooled analysis of 2 placebo-controlled 18-month trials of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance in bipolar I disorder.

作者信息

Goodwin Guy M, Bowden Charles L, Calabrese Joseph R, Grunze Heinz, Kasper Siegfried, White Robin, Greene Paul, Leadbetter Robert

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, England, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;65(3):432-41. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0321.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two clinical trials, prospectively designed for combined analysis, compared placebo, lithium, and lamotrigine for treatment of bipolar I disorder in recently depressed or manic patients.

METHOD

1315 bipolar I patients (DSM-IV) enrolled in the initial open-label phase, and 638 were stabilized and randomly assigned to 18 months of double-blind monotherapy with lamotrigine (N = 280; 50-400 mg/day fixed dose or 100-400 mg/day flexible dose), lithium (N = 167; serum level of 0.8-1.1 mEq/L), or placebo (N = 191). The primary endpoint was time from randomization to intervention for a mood episode. Data were gathered from August 1997 to August 2001.

RESULTS

Lamotrigine and lithium were superior to placebo for time to intervention for any mood episode (median survival: placebo, 86 days [95% CI = 58 to 121]; lithium, 184 days [95% CI = 119 to not calculable]; lamotrigine, 197 days [95% CI = 144 to 388]). Lamotrigine was superior to placebo for time to intervention for depression (median survival: placebo, 270 days [95% CI = 138 to not calculable]; lithium, median not calculable; lamotrigine, median not calculable). Lithium and lamotrigine were superior to placebo for time to intervention for mania (median survival not calculable for any group). Results of additional analyses adjusted for index mood were similar; however, only lithium was superior to placebo for intervention for mania. There was no evidence that either active treatment caused affective switch. Adverse event analysis indicated more diarrhea (19% vs. 7%, p <.05) and tremor (15% vs. 4%, p <.05) in lithium-treated patients compared with lamotrigine-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamotrigine and lithium stabilized mood by delaying the time to treatment for a mood episode. Lamotrigine was effective against depression and mania, with more robust activity against depression. Lithium was effective against mania.

摘要

背景

两项为联合分析而前瞻性设计的临床试验,比较了安慰剂、锂盐和拉莫三嗪对近期抑郁或躁狂的双相I型障碍患者的治疗效果。

方法

1315例双相I型障碍(DSM-IV)患者进入初始开放标签阶段,其中638例病情稳定并被随机分配接受为期18个月的双盲单一疗法,分别使用拉莫三嗪(N = 280;50 - 400毫克/天固定剂量或100 - 400毫克/天灵活剂量)、锂盐(N = 167;血清水平0.8 - 1.1毫当量/升)或安慰剂(N = 191)。主要终点是从随机分组到出现情绪发作进行干预的时间。数据收集时间为1997年8月至2001年8月。

结果

对于任何情绪发作的干预时间,拉莫三嗪和锂盐均优于安慰剂(中位生存期:安慰剂组86天[95%可信区间 = 58至121];锂盐组184天[95%可信区间 = 119至无法计算];拉莫三嗪组197天[95%可信区间 = 144至388])。对于抑郁发作的干预时间,拉莫三嗪优于安慰剂(中位生存期:安慰剂组270天[95%可信区间 = 138至无法计算];锂盐组中位生存期无法计算;拉莫三嗪组中位生存期无法计算)。对于躁狂发作的干预时间,锂盐和拉莫三嗪均优于安慰剂(任何组的中位生存期均无法计算)。针对起始情绪进行调整后的其他分析结果相似;然而,仅锂盐在干预躁狂方面优于安慰剂。没有证据表明任何一种活性治疗会导致情感转换。不良事件分析表明,与拉莫三嗪治疗的患者相比,锂盐治疗的患者腹泻(19%对7%,p <.05)和震颤(15%对4%,p <.05)更为常见。

结论

拉莫三嗪和锂盐通过延迟情绪发作的治疗时间来稳定情绪。拉莫三嗪对抑郁和躁狂均有效,对抑郁的作用更强。锂盐对躁狂有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验