Price D J, Kluger M T, Fletcher T
Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, North Shore Hospital, Shakespeare Road, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anaesthesia. 2004 May;59(5):428-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2003.03656.x.
Improvements in patient risk stratification and peri-operative beta-blockade have been suggested as methods which can reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with known cardiac risk factors. A postal questionnaire was sent to all Australian and New Zealand teaching hospitals to identify patterns of pre-operative cardiac risk evaluation and methods of peri-operative beta-blocker use. In all, 67 replies were evaluated (64% response rate). Specialist anaesthetists are present in the majority of pre-admission clinics (78%), with a designated peri-operative physician in 9%. Further cardiological referral was possible in almost all institutions (96%), and specific peri-operative physician referral in 54%. Waiting times for specialist consultation were < 7 days in the majority of cases. Whilst 79% of institutions used peri-operative beta-blockade, specific protocols were available in only 10%. In 60% of institutions, beta-blockers were administered to high-risk patients, and in 25% they were given to intermediate risk group patients. There was a wide range in the duration of pre- and postoperative beta-blocker administration. Whilst peri-operative risk assessment appears to be consistent, the pattern of beta-blockade, a known beneficial intervention, is variable. Reasons need to be identified, protocols developed and consistent administration targeted for further improvements to be made.
患者风险分层及围手术期β受体阻滞剂的应用改进已被视为可降低已知心脏危险因素患者心血管风险的方法。向所有澳大利亚和新西兰的教学医院发送了一份邮政调查问卷,以确定术前心脏风险评估模式及围手术期β受体阻滞剂的使用方法。总共评估了67份回复(回复率64%)。大多数入院前诊所(78%)有专科麻醉师,9%有指定的围手术期医生。几乎所有机构(96%)都可以进一步转诊至心脏病科,54%有特定的围手术期医生转诊。大多数情况下,专科会诊等待时间<7天。虽然79%的机构使用围手术期β受体阻滞剂,但只有10%有具体方案。60%的机构将β受体阻滞剂用于高危患者,25%用于中危组患者。术前和术后β受体阻滞剂给药持续时间差异很大。虽然围手术期风险评估似乎一致,但β受体阻滞剂(一种已知的有益干预措施)的应用模式却各不相同。需要找出原因,制定方案并进行规范给药,以进一步改进。