Suppr超能文献

糖尿病的治疗方式与急性冠状动脉综合征的预后

Treatment modalities of diabetes mellitus and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Hasdai David, Behar Solomon, Boyko Valentina, Battler Alexander

机构信息

Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2004 May;15(3):129-35. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200405000-00001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral treatments for diabetes mellitus (DM) may have a deleterious effect on acute coronary syndromes (ACS) outcomes.

AIM

We aimed to examine in-hospital mortality among patients with ACS and DM and the impact of anti-DM treatment modalities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Euro Heart Survey ACS prospectively enrolled 10484 patients across Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Of the 10214 patients with recorded DM status, 2352 (23.0%) had DM, of whom 562 were on diet alone, 1112 received oral hypoglycaemics, 561 received insulin, and 117 received both. The in-hospital mortality for ST-elevation-ACS was 9.8 and 5.7% for patients with and without DM, respectively, with an adjusted risk (95% confidence interval) of in-hospital mortality of 1.6 (1.2, 2.1). The in-hospital mortality for non-ST-elevation-ACS was 2.8 and 2.0%, accordingly, with an adjusted risk (95% confidence interval) of in-hospital mortality of 1.2 (0.8, 1.9). The in-hospital mortality for undetermined-electrocardiographic-pattern-ACS was 11.5 and 10.9%, accordingly, with an adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality of 1.1 (0.6, 2.0). Among DM patients with ST-elevation-ACS, the adjusted risks of in-hospital mortality were 1.0 for diet therapy, 0.8 (0.4, 1.5) for oral hypoglycaemics, and 1.9 (1.0, 3.8) for insulin; for DM patients and non-ST-elevation-ACS, 1.0 for diet therapy, 2.2 (0.6, 7.8) for oral hypoglycaemics, and 3.5 (1.0, 12.5) for insulin; for DM patients and undetermined-electrocardiographic-pattern-ACS, the adjusted risks of in-hospital mortality were 1.0 for diet therapy, 0.9 (0.2, 4.6) for oral hypoglycaemics, and 2.1 (0.5, 9.5) for insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute coronary syndrome patients with DM, especially those with ST-elevation, had increased in-hospital mortality. Among ACS patients with DM, those receiving insulin had worse outcomes. Outcomes were similar for those on hypoglycaemics or on diet alone.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)的口服治疗可能对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的预后产生有害影响。

目的

我们旨在研究ACS合并DM患者的院内死亡率以及抗DM治疗方式的影响。

方法与结果

欧洲心脏调查ACS前瞻性纳入了欧洲和地中海盆地的10484例患者。在记录了DM状态的10214例患者中,2352例(23.0%)患有DM,其中562例仅接受饮食治疗,1112例接受口服降糖药治疗,561例接受胰岛素治疗,117例两者都接受。ST段抬高型ACS患者的院内死亡率在有DM和无DM患者中分别为9.8%和5.7%,院内死亡的调整风险(95%置信区间)为1.6(1.2,2.1)。非ST段抬高型ACS患者的院内死亡率相应为2.8%和2.0%,院内死亡的调整风险(95%置信区间)为1.2(0.8,1.9)。心电图模式未确定的ACS患者的院内死亡率相应为11.5%和10.9%,院内死亡的调整风险为1.1(0.6,2.0)。在ST段抬高型ACS的DM患者中,饮食治疗的院内死亡调整风险为1.0,口服降糖药为0.8(0.4,1.5),胰岛素为1.9(1.0,3.8);对于DM合并非ST段抬高型ACS患者,饮食治疗为1.0,口服降糖药为2.2(0.6,7.8),胰岛素为3.5(1.0,12.5);对于DM合并心电图模式未确定的ACS患者,饮食治疗的院内死亡调整风险为1.0,口服降糖药为0.9(0.2,4.6),胰岛素为2.1(0.5,9.5)。

结论

DM合并ACS患者,尤其是ST段抬高型患者,院内死亡率增加。在DM合并ACS患者中,接受胰岛素治疗的患者预后较差。接受降糖药治疗或仅接受饮食治疗的患者预后相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验