Suppr超能文献

停止试验还是压力-流率研究?评估老年女性逼尿肌收缩力

Stop test or pressure-flow study? Measuring detrusor contractility in older females.

作者信息

Tan Thai Lian, Bergmann Margaret A, Griffiths Derek, Resnick Neil M

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(3):184-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.20020.

Abstract

AIMS

Impaired detrusor contractility is common in older adults. One aspect, detrusor contraction strength during voiding, can be measured by the isovolumetric detrusor pressure attained if flow is interrupted mechanically (a stop test). Because interruption is awkward in practice, however, simple indices or nomograms based on measurements made during uninterrupted voiding are an appealing alternative. We investigated whether such methods, originally developed for males, might be applicable in female subjects, and attempted to identify a single best method.

METHODS

We compared stop-test isovolumetric pressures with estimates based on pressure-flow studies in a group of elderly women suffering from urge incontinence. Measurements were made pre- and post-treatment with placebo or oxybutynin, allowing investigation of test-retest reliability and responsiveness to small changes of contractility.

RESULTS

Existing methods of estimating detrusor contraction strength from pressure-flow studies, including the Schäfer contractility nomogram and the projected isovolumetric pressure PIP, greatly overestimate the isovolumetric pressure in these female patients. A simple modification provides a more reliable estimate, PIP(1), equal to p(det.Qmax) + Q(max) (with pressure in cmH(2)O and Q(max) in ml/sec). Typically PIP(1) ranges from 30 to 75 cmH(2)O in this population of elderly urge-incontinent women. PIP(1), however, is less responsive to a small change in contraction strength than the isovolumetric pressure measured by mechanical interruption.

CONCLUSIONS

The parameter PIP(1) is simple to calculate from a standard pressure-flow study and may be useful for clinical assessment of detrusor contraction strength in older females. For research, however, a mechanical stop test still remains the most reliable and responsive method. The Schäfer contractility nomogram and related parameters such as DECO and BCI are not suitable for use in older women.

摘要

目的

逼尿肌收缩功能受损在老年人中很常见。其中一个方面,排尿时的逼尿肌收缩强度,可以通过机械中断尿流(停止试验)时获得的等容逼尿肌压力来测量。然而,由于在实际操作中中断尿流很不方便,基于不间断排尿时测量值的简单指标或列线图是一种很有吸引力的替代方法。我们研究了这些最初为男性开发的方法是否适用于女性受试者,并试图确定一种最佳方法。

方法

我们将停止试验等容压力与一组患有急迫性尿失禁的老年女性基于压力 - 流率研究的估计值进行了比较。在安慰剂或奥昔布宁治疗前后进行测量,从而可以研究重测信度以及对收缩功能微小变化的反应性。

结果

从压力 - 流率研究中估计逼尿肌收缩强度的现有方法,包括施费尔收缩性列线图和预计等容压力PIP,在这些女性患者中大大高估了等容压力。一种简单的修正提供了更可靠的估计值PIP(1),等于p(det.Qmax) + Q(max)(压力单位为cmH₂O,Q(max)单位为ml/秒)。在这群老年急迫性尿失禁女性中,PIP(1)通常在30至75 cmH₂O之间。然而,与通过机械中断测量的等容压力相比,PIP(1)对收缩强度的微小变化反应较小。

结论

参数PIP(1)可从标准压力 - 流率研究中简单计算得出,可能有助于对老年女性逼尿肌收缩强度进行临床评估。然而,对于研究而言,机械停止试验仍然是最可靠且反应性最强的方法。施费尔收缩性列线图以及相关参数如DECO和BCI不适用于老年女性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验