Greenberg Paul, Corey-Lisle Patricia K, Birnbaum Howard, Marynchenko Maryna, Claxton Ami
Analysis Group Inc, Boston, Massachusetts 02199, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):363-73. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00003.
Conservative estimates indicate between 10% and 20% of all individuals with major depressive disorders (MDDs) fail to respond to conventional antidepressant therapies. Amongst those with MDD, individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been found to be frequent users of healthcare services and to incur significantly greater costs than those without TRD. Given the prevalence of the disorder, it is understandable that MDDs are responsible for a significant amount of both direct and indirect healthcare costs.
To provide empirical findings for employees likely to have TRD based on analysis of employer claims data, in the context of previous research.
We conducted a claims data analysis of employees of a large national (US) employer. The data source consisted of medical, pharmaceutical and disability claims from a Fortune 100 manufacturer for the years 1996-1998 (total beneficiaries >100000). The employee sample included individuals with medical or disability claims for MDDs (n = 1692). A treatment pattern algorithm was applied to classify MDD patients into TRD-likely (n = 180) and TRD-unlikely groups. Treated prevalence of select comorbid conditions and the patient costs (direct and indirect) from the employer perspective by condition were compared among TRD-likely and TRD-unlikely employees, and with a 10% random sample of the overall employee population for 1998.
The average annual cost of employees considered TRD-likely was dollars US 14490 per employee, while the cost for depressed but TRD-unlikely employees was dollars US 6665 per employee, and dollars US 4043 for the employee from the random sample. TRD beneficiaries used more than twice as many medical services compared with TRD-unlikely patients, and incurred significantly greater work loss costs.
TRD has gained increasing recognition due to both the clinical challenges and economic burdens associated with the condition. TRD imposes a significant economic burden on an employer. TRD-likely employees are more likely to be treated for selected comorbid conditions and have higher medical and work loss costs across all conditions.
保守估计表明,所有患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的个体中,有10%至20%对传统抗抑郁疗法无反应。在患有MDD的人群中,发现难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者频繁使用医疗服务,且产生的费用比没有TRD的患者高得多。鉴于该疾病的普遍性,MDD导致大量直接和间接医疗费用是可以理解的。
在先前研究的背景下,通过分析雇主索赔数据,为可能患有TRD的员工提供实证研究结果。
我们对一家大型美国雇主的员工进行了索赔数据分析。数据来源包括一家财富100强制造商1996 - 1998年的医疗、药品和残疾索赔(总受益人>100000)。员工样本包括患有MDD的医疗或残疾索赔个体(n = 1692)。应用一种治疗模式算法将MDD患者分为可能患有TRD组(n = 180)和不太可能患有TRD组。比较了可能患有TRD和不太可能患有TRD的员工之间以及与1998年全体员工10%随机样本相比,特定合并症的治疗患病率以及从雇主角度按病情计算的患者费用(直接和间接)。
被认为可能患有TRD的员工平均每年费用为每人14490美元,而患有抑郁症但不太可能患有TRD的员工每人费用为6665美元,随机样本中的员工每人费用为4043美元。与不太可能患有TRD的患者相比,可能患有TRD的受益人使用的医疗服务多出两倍以上,并且产生的工作损失成本显著更高。
由于与该疾病相关的临床挑战和经济负担,TRD越来越受到认可。TRD给雇主带来了重大的经济负担。可能患有TRD的员工更有可能因特定合并症接受治疗,并且在所有病情下医疗和工作损失成本更高。