Suppr超能文献

迷走神经刺激术(VNS)治疗难治性抑郁症:疗效、副作用及预后预测因素

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant depression: efficacy, side effects, and predictors of outcome.

作者信息

Sackeim H A, Rush A J, George M S, Marangell L B, Husain M M, Nahas Z, Johnson C R, Seidman S, Giller C, Haines S, Simpson R K, Goodman R R

机构信息

Department of Biological Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Nov;25(5):713-28. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00271-8.

Abstract

This open pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 60 patients with treatment-resistant major depressive episodes (MDEs) aimed to: 1) define the response rate; 2) determine the profile of side effects; and, most importantly; 3) establish predictors of clinical outcome. Participants were outpatients with nonatypical, nonpsychotic, major depressive or bipolar disorder who had not responded to at least two medication trials from different antidepressant classes in the current MDE. While on stable medication regimens, the patients completed a baseline period followed by device implantation. A 2-week, single blind, recovery period (no stimulation) was followed by 10 weeks of VNS. Of 59 completers (one patient improved during the recovery period), the response rate was 30.5% for the primary HRSD(28) measure, 34.0% for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRAS), and 37.3% for the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Score (CGI-I of 1 or 2). The most common side effect was voice alteration or hoarseness, 55.0% (33/60), which was generally mild and related to output current intensity. History of treatment resistance was predictive of VNS outcome. Patients who had never received ECT (lifetime) were 3.9 times more likely to respond. Of the 13 patients who had not responded to more than seven adequate antidepressant trials in the current MDE, none responded, compared to 39.1% of the remaining 46 patients (p =.0057). Thus, VNS appears to be most effective in patients with low to moderate, but not extreme, antidepressant resistance. Evidence concerning VNS' long-term therapeutic benefits and tolerability will be critical in determining its role in treatment-resistant depression.

摘要

这项针对60例难治性重度抑郁发作(MDE)患者的迷走神经刺激(VNS)开放性试验研究旨在:1)确定缓解率;2)确定副作用情况;最重要的是;3)建立临床结局的预测指标。参与者为非非典型、非精神病性的重度抑郁或双相情感障碍门诊患者,他们在当前的MDE中对至少两种不同抗抑郁药类别的药物试验均无反应。在稳定的药物治疗方案下,患者完成基线期,随后进行设备植入。在2周的单盲恢复期(无刺激)后,进行10周的VNS治疗。在59例完成治疗者中(1例患者在恢复期病情改善),主要的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD,28项)测量的缓解率为30.5%,蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRAS)为34.0%,临床总体印象改善评分(CGI-I为1或2)为37.3%。最常见的副作用是声音改变或嘶哑,发生率为55.0%(33/60),通常为轻度,与输出电流强度有关。治疗抵抗史可预测VNS结局。从未接受过电休克治疗(终生)的患者反应的可能性高3.9倍。在当前MDE中对超过7次充分的抗抑郁药试验均无反应的13例患者中,无人有反应,而其余46例患者中有39.1%有反应(p = 0.0057)。因此,VNS似乎在抗抑郁药抵抗程度低至中度但非极端的患者中最有效。关于VNS长期治疗益处和耐受性的证据对于确定其在难治性抑郁症治疗中的作用至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验