van Osselaer Stijn M J, Janiszewski Chris, Cunha Marcus
Center for Decision Research, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):626-38. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.626.
Recent studies involving nonlinear discrimination problems suggest that stimuli in human associative learning are represented configurally with narrow generalization, such that presentation of stimuli that are even slightly dissimilar to stored configurations weakly activate these configurations. The authors note that another well-known set of findings in human associative learning, cue-interaction phenomena, suggest relatively broad generalization. Three experiments show that current models of human associative learning, which try to model both nonlinear discrimination and cue interaction as the result of 1 process, fail because they cannot simultaneously account for narrow and broad generalization. Results suggest that human associative learning involves (a) an exemplar-based process with configural stimulus representation and narrow generalization and (b) an adaptive learning process characterized by broad generalization and cue interaction.
近期涉及非线性辨别问题的研究表明,人类联想学习中的刺激是以构型方式呈现的,泛化范围较窄,以至于即使与存储构型稍有不同的刺激呈现也只能微弱地激活这些构型。作者指出,人类联想学习中另一组著名的发现,即线索交互现象,则表明泛化范围相对较广。三项实验表明,当前试图将非线性辨别和线索交互都建模为单一过程结果的人类联想学习模型是失败的,因为它们无法同时解释窄泛化和广泛化。结果表明,人类联想学习涉及(a)一个基于范例的过程,具有构型刺激表征和窄泛化,以及(b)一个以广泛化和线索交互为特征的适应性学习过程。