Bartleson J D
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Pain Med. 2002 Sep;3(3):260-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02043.x.
Opioid analgesics are very effective for treating pain, but their chronic use in nonmalignant conditions is controversial. Low back pain is a common condition, and chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most frequent regional pain syndrome in the United States. This article reviews the evidence for and against the use of chronic opioid analgesic therapy (COAT) for patients with CLBP unrelated to cancer.
A literature review was conducted looking for reports of oral or transdermal opioid analgesic therapy for CLBP.
There are very few randomized controlled trials of COAT for CLBP. The scant evidence that is available suggests that over the short-term, COAT is helpful with patients with CLBP. In the published reports, most of which are brief in duration, COAT is associated with moderate side effects but a low risk of abuse or drug addiction. COAT was not associated with adverse long-term sequelae. Longer-acting opioid analgesics may be preferable to shorter-acting agents. Patient selection and close follow-up are critical to good outcomes.
There is a place for the use of chronic oral or transdermal opioid analgesics in the treatment of some patients with CLBP.
阿片类镇痛药在治疗疼痛方面非常有效,但其在非恶性疾病中的长期使用存在争议。腰痛是一种常见病症,慢性腰痛(CLBP)是美国最常见的局部疼痛综合征。本文回顾了支持和反对对非癌症相关CLBP患者使用慢性阿片类镇痛疗法(COAT)的证据。
进行文献综述,查找关于口服或透皮阿片类镇痛疗法治疗CLBP的报告。
关于CLBP的COAT随机对照试验非常少。现有少量证据表明,短期内,COAT对CLBP患者有帮助。在已发表的报告中,大多数持续时间较短,COAT会带来中度副作用,但滥用或药物成瘾风险较低。COAT与不良长期后遗症无关。长效阿片类镇痛药可能比短效药物更可取。患者选择和密切随访对良好预后至关重要。
慢性口服或透皮阿片类镇痛药在治疗某些CLBP患者中占有一席之地。