Etter Jean-François
Institute of social and preventive medicine, University of Geneva, CMU, 1 rue Michel-Servet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 May 10;74(2):211-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.12.007.
We tested whether asking about alcohol consumption before asking the CAGE questions modified the answers to the CAGE test.
Randomized trial on a smoking cessation website, in English, in 2003. Half the participants began by answering questions on quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption and then, on a second web page, answered the CAGE questionnaire (format A). The other half answered first the CAGE and then questions on quantity and frequency (format B).
The survey was answered by 1213 people. Fewer people gave positive answers to three of the four CAGE questions in format A than in format B. Cut-down, 32% versus 38% (P= 0.01); annoyed, 13% versus 18% (P = 0.02); eye-opener, 5% versus 8% (P = 0.02). Fewer people had a CAGE score >/=2, indicating possible alcoholism, in format A than in format B (26% versus 32%, P = 0.04). This effect was stronger in men (CAGE > or = 2, format A, 29%; format B, 39%; P = 0.03), and it was not statistically significant in women (CAGE > or = 2, format A, 25%; format B, 28%; P = 0.4).
In an internet survey, asking questions about the quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption before asking the CAGE questionnaire produced fewer positive answers to the CAGE. This effect was observed only in men.
我们测试了在询问CAGE问题之前先询问饮酒情况是否会改变CAGE测试的答案。
2003年在一个戒烟网站上进行的随机试验,采用英文。一半参与者先回答关于饮酒量和饮酒频率的问题,然后在第二个网页上回答CAGE问卷(格式A)。另一半参与者先回答CAGE问卷,然后回答关于饮酒量和饮酒频率的问题(格式B)。
1213人参与了该调查。格式A中四个CAGE问题里有三个得到肯定回答的人数比格式B中的少。减少饮酒量,分别为32%对38%(P = 0.01);感到烦恼,分别为13%对18%(P = 0.02);清晨饮酒,分别为5%对8%(P = 0.02)。格式A中CAGE得分≥2(表明可能酗酒)的人数比格式B中的少(26%对32%,P = 0.04)。这种效应在男性中更强(CAGE≥2,格式A为29%;格式B为39%;P = 0.03),在女性中无统计学意义(CAGE≥2,格式A为25%;格式B为28%;P = 0.4)。
在一项网络调查中,在询问CAGE问卷之前先询问饮酒量和饮酒频率,CAGE问卷得到的肯定回答更少。这种效应仅在男性中观察到。