Waterson E J, Murray-Lyon I M
Gastrointestinal Unit, Charing Cross Hospital, London.
Alcohol Alcohol. 1989;24(1):21-30.
This paper assesses different methods of asking about alcohol consumption in the antenatal clinic. Reliable screening methods are essential if appropriate intervention is to be accurately targeted. Women attending antenatal clinic for the first time were questioned about their alcohol consumption in the period immediately before confirmation of pregnancy. Quantity-frequency questions, a question about bingeing and the Cage Questions were asked as part of the routine clinical history by the interviewing doctor. In addition, the women were given a further self-completed questionnaire which contained more detailed questions about the usual quantity and frequency of drinking beers, wines and spirits, the Cage Questions again and the Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (BMAST). Asking simple quantity-frequency questions coupled with a question about bingeing during the clinical history was shown to be a quick and efficient method of estimating alcohol intake. Self-administered questionnaires were shown to be unnecessary and although the Cage Questions performed better than the BMAST, these alcoholism screening tests were found to be unreliable in this population in which drinking was generally at a low level.
本文评估了在产前诊所询问饮酒情况的不同方法。若要准确进行适当干预,可靠的筛查方法至关重要。首次到产前诊所就诊的女性在确认怀孕前即刻被询问饮酒情况。访谈医生在常规临床病史询问中会询问饮酒量 - 频率问题、关于暴饮的问题以及Cage问题。此外,还让这些女性填写一份进一步的自填式问卷,其中包含关于啤酒、葡萄酒和烈酒通常饮用量及频率的更详细问题、再次询问Cage问题以及简短密歇根酒精中毒筛查测试(BMAST)。结果表明,在临床病史询问中询问简单的饮酒量 - 频率问题并加上关于暴饮的问题是估计酒精摄入量的快速有效方法。自填式问卷被证明是不必要的,尽管Cage问题比BMAST表现更好,但在这个总体饮酒水平普遍较低的人群中,这些酒精中毒筛查测试被发现不可靠。