Narayan Mahesh, Xu Guoqiang, Ripoll Daniel R, Zhai Huili, Breuker Kathrin, Wanjalla Celestine, Leung Howard J, Navon Amiel, Welker Ervin, McLafferty Fred W, Scheraga Harold A
Baker Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1301, USA.
J Mol Biol. 2004 May 7;338(4):795-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.014.
Using DTT(red) as the reducing agent, the kinetics of the reductive unfolding of onconase, a frog ribonuclease, has been examined. An intermediate containing three disulfides, Ir, that is formed rapidly in the reductive pathway, is more resistant to further reduction than the parent molecule, indicating that the remaining disulfides in onconase are less accessible to DTT(red). Disulfide-bond mapping of Ir indicated that it is a single species lacking the (30-75) disulfide bond. The reductive unfolding pattern of onconase is consistent with an analysis of the exposed surface area of the cysteine sulfur atoms in the (30-75) disulfide bond, which reveals that these atoms are about four- and sevenfold, respectively, more exposed than those in the next two maximally exposed disulfides. By contrast, in the reductive unfolding of the homologue, RNase A, there are two intermediates, arising from the reduction of the (40-95) and (65-72) disulfide bonds, which takes place in parallel, and on a much longer time-scale, compared to the initial reduction of onconase; this behavior is consistent with the almost equally exposed surface areas of the cysteine sulfur atoms that form the (40-95) and (65-72) disulfide bonds in RNase A and the fourfold more exposed cysteine sulfur atoms of the (30-75) disulfide bond in onconase. Analysis and in silico mutation of the residues around the (40-95) disulfide bond in RNase A, which is analogous to the (30-75) disulfide bond of onconase, reveal that the side-chain of tyrosine 92 of RNase A, a highly conserved residue among mammalian pancreatic ribonucleases, lies atop the (40-95) disulfide bond, resulting in a shielding of the corresponding sulfur atoms from the solvent; such burial of the (30-75) sulfur atoms is absent from onconase, due to the replacement of Tyr92 by Arg73, which is situated away from the (30-75) disulfide bond and into the solvent, resulting in the large exposed surface-area of the cysteine sulfur atoms forming this bond. Removal of Tyr92 from RNase A resulted in the relatively rapid reduction of the mutant to form a single intermediate (des [40-95] Y92A), i.e. it resulted in an onconase-like reductive unfolding behavior. The reduction of the P93A mutant of RNase A proceeds through a single intermediate, the des [40-95] P93A species, as in onconase. Although mutation of Pro93 to Ala does not increase the exposed surface area of the (40-95) cysteine sulfur atoms, structural analysis of the mutant reveals that there is greater flexibility in the (40-95) disulfide bond compared to the (65-72) disulfide bond that may make the (40-95) disulfide bond much easier to expose, consistent with the reductive unfolding pathway and kinetics of P93A. Mutation of Tyr92 to Phe92 in RNase A has no effect on its reductive unfolding pathway, suggesting that the hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group of Tyr92 and the carbonyl group of Lys37 has no impact on the local unfolding free energy required to expose the (40-95) disulfide bond. Thus, these data shed light on the differences between the reductive unfolding pathways of the two homologous proteins and provide a structural basis for the origin of this difference.
以二硫苏糖醇(红色)作为还原剂,研究了蛙核糖核酸酶癌酶还原解折叠的动力学。在还原途径中迅速形成的一种含有三个二硫键的中间体Ir,比亲本分子更耐进一步还原,这表明癌酶中其余的二硫键对二硫苏糖醇(红色)的可及性较低。Ir的二硫键图谱表明它是一种缺乏(30 - 75)二硫键的单一物种。癌酶的还原解折叠模式与对(30 - 75)二硫键中半胱氨酸硫原子暴露表面积的分析一致,该分析表明这些原子的暴露程度分别比接下来两个最大暴露的二硫键中的原子高约四倍和七倍。相比之下,在同源物核糖核酸酶A的还原解折叠过程中,有两个中间体,由(40 - 95)和(65 - 72)二硫键的还原产生,这两个过程并行发生,且与癌酶的初始还原相比,时间尺度长得多;这种行为与核糖核酸酶A中形成(40 - 95)和(65 - 72)二硫键的半胱氨酸硫原子几乎相同的暴露表面积以及癌酶中(30 - 75)二硫键中半胱氨酸硫原子大四倍的暴露程度一致。对核糖核酸酶A中与癌酶的(30 - 75)二硫键类似的(40 - 95)二硫键周围残基进行分析和计算机模拟突变,结果表明核糖核酸酶A的酪氨酸92(哺乳动物胰腺核糖核酸酶中高度保守的残基)的侧链位于(40 - 95)二硫键之上,导致相应的硫原子被溶剂屏蔽;癌酶中不存在(30 - 75)硫原子的这种埋藏情况,因为73位的精氨酸取代了92位的酪氨酸,该精氨酸远离(30 - 75)二硫键并伸向溶剂,导致形成该键的半胱氨酸硫原子具有较大的暴露表面积。从核糖核酸酶A中去除酪氨酸92导致突变体相对快速地还原形成单一中间体(去[40 - 95] Y92A),即它导致了类似癌酶的还原解折叠行为。核糖核酸酶A的P93A突变体的还原过程通过单一中间体去[40 - 95] P93A物种进行,与癌酶情况相同。尽管将脯氨酸93突变为丙氨酸并没有增加(40 - 95)半胱氨酸硫原子的暴露表面积,但对该突变体的结构分析表明,与(65 - 72)二硫键相比,(40 - 95)二硫键具有更大的灵活性,这可能使(40 - 95)二硫键更容易暴露,这与P93A的还原解折叠途径和动力学一致。将核糖核酸酶A中的酪氨酸92突变为苯丙氨酸92对其还原解折叠途径没有影响,这表明酪氨酸92的羟基与赖氨酸37的羰基之间的氢键对暴露(40 - 95)二硫键所需的局部解折叠自由能没有影响。因此,这些数据揭示了这两种同源蛋白质还原解折叠途径之间的差异,并为这种差异的起源提供了结构基础。